Rules for winning the Nobel peace prize

[Squeezer]

All veterans? Really?

Well, maybe not all. For instance those like GWB that served in the Texas Air Bullshit during Vietnam, or the crazy ones asking for change on the corner, but any mentally fit former soldier probably knows more about the intricacies of war than you and I could debate in a million conversations.

[Squeezer]

Edit: and as to your figure skating analogy, I agree that experiencing figure skating can help you understand how it is judged, but is not strictly necessary. As a counter-example, I've never played hockey but know that Ovechkin is a great player.

But do you understand his greatness? You see him score goals sure, and deek defenders and what not, but do you truly understand the athleticism behind one of his moves? Do you know what the speed of the game feels like? What it means to have to face talent of that caliber and still perform as well as Ovechkin does? Maybe, but only at a most basic level. A former pro hockey player probably gets it on a completely different level than you do.

[Mattey]

Yeah, that wasn't a very good example.

Your argument is that a soldier, any soldier, has a deeper understanding of what war is and what it entails, correct? Just want to get this straight before we continue.

[Squeezer]

I'm saying that any soldier that sees and experiences combat is more knowledgeable about warfare practices than the common layman, like you and I.

[Summa]

knowing ovechkin is a great player doesn't make you an expert, and without knowing or having expertise over your subject (so says plato....i hear he knows things) you cannot learn anything and have no right to speak about it. but hey thats just what plato says.

as for my previous comments, yes most of it was sarcasm, and no i don't believe what i said, but it is necessary to realize that the most efficient way to win a war is decimation of the population. that and having people of high ranking office in the invaded country take foreign brides (history proves this).

[Mattey]

I'm saying that any soldier that sees and experiences combat is more knowledgeable about warfare practices than the common layman, like you and I.

Okay, so you would argue that a random soldier would know more about warfare practices, than say Noam Chomsky?

[genocidal]

Just popping in to laugh at paradise for telling us he lectures to "tens of people." You're a college freshman, Panda knows you IRL, and your little jig is up (if it ever started).

[kthx]

Why doesn't Mattey realize hes bad at this, this forums is finally turning conservative after the terrible leadership of the current administration.

[Galleleo]

It seems to be far more of a semantics battle between Squeez, Summa and Mattey than them arguing from a conservative or liberal point of view.

[Mattey]

No Galleleo, everything is either 1 thing or the opposite. There is no such thing as a moderate in a kthx world.

[Jerome Scuggs]

I don't understand why war suddenly makes the crimes government commits, crimes

[D1st0rt]

also, congress sucks

[Mattey]

I don't understand why war suddenly makes the crimes government commits, crimes

Yeah, because the government regularly bombs it's own citizens. Oh wait, that doesn't happen and your post makes no sense.

[Squeezer]

Yeah, because the government regularly bombs it's own citizens. Oh wait, that doesn't happen and your post makes no sense.

he does that to be purposefully cryptic and obtuse about things.

really make him look that much cooler when society collapses (hint it hasn't happened before despite the predictions of far more lauded men than yourself). Scuggs can totally say, "I told you so" and live in his hell hole of a giant social-darwinism experiment.

[Epinephrine]

Arguing that all soldiers who served there know vastly more than anyone else about the war in Afghanistan is like saying anyone who's worked in a bank (including tellers, the janitor, etc) know vastly more about credit default swaps than anyone else in the world.