Hot or Not Week 3

[kthx]

I don't remember Raspi being as much of a whining cunt like five years ago.

[Burnt]

TWDTB
Dishonorable mention- Ignite playing Bill C and Zizu in all 3 games,

Good thing you weren't around last season when I broke similar rules and no one noticed

[Exalt]

I'll say this again:

if a squad is struggling to have 5 for dueling matches and 8 in basing, it shouldn't be illegal to have ppl play in 3 matches..hell it shouldn't be illegal in any case...stupid rule in the first place...ppl who can play all 3 well are really few in number anyway, is this rule in place because you want to limit their influence on games or because you want to make sure maximum number of ppl get to play? Lineups shouldn't be restricted in any way imo.

Also should have more room in roster for perhaps 6-7 level players just to avoid these situations where a squad is struggling to show enough players.

Which is better, a squad is struggling to field enough players and throws in anyone and doesn't pay attention to this stupid rule and tries to make the match worth playing?

Or realizing this and not fielding enough players, making the match obsolete for both teams and wheres the fun in that?

If puma gets punished because of this, this will probably mean whoever is playing puma next week in matches gets semi-free wins. No challenge = no fun.

why don't you make your great captain ignite do what everyone else does and make him recruit players that are actually active? This makes sense right? It sure does to me. I mean, I realize ignite doesn't know how to do this, because look at how fucked up quake is atm. I think there are no excuses for this, because you all knew the rules. You could easily trade for a lower tier player that is decent in wb or jav that will show up every week to start. It isn't that difficult, but ignite seems to be incapable when he cannot PAY for players to join. Go figure.

I think puma deserves whatever is handed to them, because you all knew better.

[Raspi]

Stupid rule

I'll say this again:

if a squad is struggling to have 5 for dueling matches and 8 in basing, it shouldn't be illegal to have ppl play in 3 matches..hell it shouldn't be illegal in any case...stupid rule in the first place...ppl who can play all 3 well are really few in number anyway, is this rule in place because you want to limit their influence on games or because you want to make sure maximum number of ppl get to play? Lineups shouldn't be restricted in any way imo.

Also should have more room in roster for perhaps 6-7 level players just to avoid these situations where a squad is struggling to show enough players.

Which is better, a squad is struggling to field enough players and throws in anyone and doesn't pay attention to this stupid rule and tries to make the match worth playing?

Or realizing this and not fielding enough players, making the match obsolete for both teams and wheres the fun in that?

If puma gets punished because of this, this will probably mean whoever is playing puma next week in matches gets semi-free wins. No challenge = no fun.

[Jeenyuss]

jeenyuss (shark)

[PaulOakenfold]

All the sentences don't have to be in a single paragraph. I can't read those reviews easily.

[Turban]

" .. If a player plays in all 3 league matches, the one with the largest margin of victory will be forfeited. In the event that he is the only player available, he may compete (barring it does not conflict with any other rules), but will then be unable to compete the next week entirely.. "

So, PUMA forfeits both of their wins this week? Gj.

Completely forgot that the draft matches was today. Just got home..

[Chuckle]

Dishonorable mention- Ignite playing Bill C in all 3 games

he also added zizu in all 3...

[Black Mage]

Hes in china right now. So the games were at what 3 am in the morning for him? And he has work at 8 sounds good enough to me

Yeah, thats a pretty reasonable excuse but he should have given his assistants proper instructions...and maybe a roster? Or whoever is that assistant (I'm guessing Ease?) should have double checked on the website.

[Unabled]

Hes in china right now. So the games were at what 3 am in the morning for him? And he has work at 8 sounds good enough to me

[Black Mage]

I was at work and therefore specced for the 4 lagout deaths

But you did lagout once upon return and went 1-6.

Added last section and corrected a few things.

[the_paul]

I was at work and therefore specced for the 4 lagout deaths

[Black Mage]

I think thats why I DO blame him. Unless he had a real good reason...

[Unabled]

Cant blame creature. He wasnt here he was asleep

[Refer]

:wub: