Originally posted by The Crimson King
Oh, yeah. On the "starving babies?" Wow, that really depends on your point of view. Am I guilty for not sending my money to some starving baby in Zimbabwe? (Wow, wealth redistribution on a global level -- there goes the neighborhood.) (Because if I am, you are too. Let's see your receipts from the Worldwide Starving Baby Fund.) Is the USA, then, guilty for maintaining trade embargoes? Well, I guess you could say that, if you were willfully blind to the nature of world politics. Is it our fault that some country's economy can't feed its citizens without US help? Bluntly, no the fuck it's not.
Oh, yeah. On the "starving babies?" Wow, that really depends on your point of view. Am I guilty for not sending my money to some starving baby in Zimbabwe? (Wow, wealth redistribution on a global level -- there goes the neighborhood.) (Because if I am, you are too. Let's see your receipts from the Worldwide Starving Baby Fund.) Is the USA, then, guilty for maintaining trade embargoes? Well, I guess you could say that, if you were willfully blind to the nature of world politics. Is it our fault that some country's economy can't feed its citizens without US help? Bluntly, no the fuck it's not.
You obviously don't know what you are talking about. American foreign policy has prevented food from being distributed to the population of Iraq. They closed down baby food plants, thus starving around 500,000 Iraqi children <a conservative estimate> to death. Don't even think that you have the right to call this a 3rd grade illegible scrawling. This is what is really taking place over seas. You just sit there and soak up your propaganda, way to be a useless American citizen.
Comment