I think this is not a good idea unfortunately as it ruins feeler vote tactics which are often used and never even meant to be followed. I strongly feel in a tie, a lot/revote should be done between all players in who participated making the tie. Majority then on the revote is the lynch. If it is a tie for a second time no one dies. Just my thoughts on how it should go.
Also I'm still trying to decide on this game if I want to sign up. Any start date being thought of? I have a trip upcoming that may affect my decision to sign up or not.
I was thinking right away, as soon as we have enough players. Not sure what fis' timeline is.
When's your trip? You can't log in once/day to post?
Also I'm still trying to decide on this game if I want to sign up. Any start date being thought of? I have a trip upcoming that may affect my decision to sign up or not.
So I'll throw this variation in here:
How about we vary the lynching rules a bit. Imagine there's 10 people playing in total. Once there's 6 (majority that doesn't allow a tie) votes on Undercut at the same time, Undercut will be lynched once the hosts logs in and tracks it. So even if one or all of the 6 votes would unvote later, it wouldn't matter, and the phase will end. Interesting part is that once there's 5 votes on Undercut, and the 6th one is voting him, he will be the one to hammer him, adding a sort of extra weight on that last vote.
If the votes are spread out like 4-3-3 then the one with the highest votes would be lynched as usual after phase end.
What you think?
I think this is not a good idea unfortunately as it ruins feeler vote tactics which are often used and never even meant to be followed. I strongly feel in a tie, a lot/revote should be done between all players in who participated making the tie. Majority then on the revote is the lynch. If it is a tie for a second time no one dies. Just my thoughts on how it should go.
Leave a comment: