Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

A Good Idea:

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    SS Developers really look at that and use them?
    When Is 1337 Bad? When It's Your Ping! :D
    -John

    Comment


    • #17
      Originally posted by JohnCho


      SS Developers really look at that and use them?
      That forum was designed so you can give suggestions to the development of Continuum.
      "The weak can never forgive. Forgiveness is the attribute of the strong" -Mahatma Gandhi

      -FLaBiN
      flabin@trenchwars.org

      Comment


      • #18
        Originally posted by Yoshiba
        i hope your not gonna chatkick me miggsy are ya?
        You're not on any of my chats, thank god.

        Comment


        • #19
          im enjoying my stay on annux's chat. its a family friendly environment. annux is my hero
          Mayo Inc. - We should change god's name to "Tod"... see if there's any followers. - Mattey

          Comment


          • #20
            Originally posted by Yoshiba
            i hope your not gonna chatkick me miggsy are ya?
            Annux's name is Miggs too? wtf? I'm confused.
            sage

            Comment


            • #21
              Thinks backwards... it would be much easier to impliment ?chatinvite and ?chatuninvite then a ?chatban. Only people on a nick that has been invited may join the chat. All others are ignored.

              -Spam
              Who got the boombeef?

              Comment


              • #22
                Like Sycotik said, people would horde chats. But Annux, removing the ?chatgrant command won't work, since people will take new chats and new chats and new chats, and they will KEEP them, since they can't give them away.
                I don't think ?chatcreate=annux will work. :/

                Spam, is that with or without owning of chats?
                If it's without, it could work well.
                Warfare> Waerfare, who's that?
                MILITANT> wearfare
                MILITANT> it's lycanthropy for... fares
                MILITANT> bus fares
                ToP_DawG!> yah
                MILITANT> at the full moon, you become a New York City Metro ticket

                Comment


                • #23
                  That could work Spam, but isn't ?chatuninvite the same as ?chatban or ?chatbanip.

                  However I like the idea of the owner taking initiative and inviting people. This prevents a random stranger from accessing a private chat just by knowing its name.


                  Tin, why would people horde chats if they can't do anything with them? With names and squads, you can at least trade them but what can you really do with a chat?

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    pfft im still waiting for

                    ?squadrape
                    and
                    ?sex

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Originally posted by Annux
                      That could work Spam, but isn't ?chatuninvite the same as ?chatban or ?chatbanip.
                      The ?chatuninvite would just remove them from the list of people who have access. So basically everyone is banned, unless they are ?chatinvited. Would help keep track of aliases and like someone said, random people from joining.

                      -Spam
                      Who got the boombeef?

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Do you think that's possible to enact?

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          I'm sure it's possible.. dunno how probable it is. Up to PriitK.. I'm pretty sure this has been suggested before

                          -Spam
                          Who got the boombeef?

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Originally posted by Annux

                            Tin, why would people horde chats if they can't do anything with them? With names and squads, you can at least trade them but what can you really do with a chat?
                            Do you seriously think people with 30-40 names use them?
                            No way.
                            They just have them, fuck knows why. "Just in case", maybe.

                            It'll be the same with chats.
                            Warfare> Waerfare, who's that?
                            MILITANT> wearfare
                            MILITANT> it's lycanthropy for... fares
                            MILITANT> bus fares
                            ToP_DawG!> yah
                            MILITANT> at the full moon, you become a New York City Metro ticket

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Originally posted by Mayo Inc.
                              im enjoying my stay on annux's chat. its a family friendly environment. annux is my hero
                              'Tis a wonderful chat indeed, one of the best I've been on in awhile.

                              <3 Annux
                              jasonofabitch loves!!!!

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                I'm a fun guy, a fungi! Get it! chuckle, chuckle

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X