Originally posted by Mantra-Slider
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Nuclear Bombs are awesome :D
Collapse
X
-
I left you a message in-game jerome. why are you not online when I need your *guidance*!?
Leave a comment:
-
Fuck.Originally posted by Jerome View Post
One of the fallout paths on their hypothetical map goes right over my house.
Dicks.
P.S. JEROME, ANSWER
P.S.S. Jerome when did you become Barbara Streisand? Wtf.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by FarScape View PostUSA could bomb near cities just to make them surrender, who knows if they would?
Leave a comment:
-
Jerome, please explain what the FUCK your forum title says in l33t speak.
Leave a comment:
-
jerome
how many people died in europe in the world war 2? did they used atomic bomb to do so?
you might see it as it was aweful deed, and it was! but seriously, it could be nuclear or could be another few years of death toll for both sides...
USA could bomb near cities just to make them surrender, who knows if they would?
its history... lets not enter this.
Leave a comment:
-
fun quiz time:Originally posted by FarScape View Postyou are so fucking blind that its amazing...
maybe people fear that those countries will have nuclear weapon because they have dictatorship\theocracy\tyranny goverment and not a Democracy one? such a goverment that can do whatever they want not caring even about what the people in their own country think? like japan and germany in WW2 for example?
amazing that even after two world wars people are still so naive, and it was only 60 years ago.
and btw, iran said many times that israel should be destroied. a very peaceful country develope nulcear, we shouldnt worry at all right?
1. list the only country that has ever used a nuclear weapon in a time of war.
2. list the only country that has ever willfully used said weapon on not one, but two major cities, withholding that decision from its people, thereby ignoring them and doing whatever the head of state had wanted.
3. please state the political system (socialist, democratic, fascist, etc) of aforementioned country.
Leave a comment:
-
Whoever you heard that from is completely wrong. It would take Japan roughly 164 days to arm a nuclear arsenal.Originally posted by Liquid Blue View PostMight have been here or another forum, but I believe I read that Japan could supposedly have a nuke ready in 48 hours if need-be.
Leave a comment:
-
I'm totally there with you. I mean, he needed a movie made about him, so he kidnapped a director. The food on the train sucked, so he kidnapped and then flew in a chef who he knew to be talented. The 300 story tower building project ran out of money, so rather than let the citizens beleive him to be incompetant, he did the logical thing and made it illegal to be made reference to.Originally posted by Epinephrine View PostKim Jong-Il isn't crazy... he's quite rational in fact, and basically every world leader or diplomat who's ever visited him has said that.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Liquid Blue View PostEh, it's not so much that people are afraid that places like North Korea and Iran will actually use the nukes, it's more about the level of power that comes with them. Nukes are a status symbol, a bargining chip that says "hey, you can't ignore me" for a country. If Iran and North Korea develop nukes, they can't be brushed aside any more, they have to be taken seriously. Not too many over in the US like that idea.
you are so fucking blind that its amazing...
maybe people fear that those countries will have nuclear weapon because they have dictatorship\theocracy\tyranny goverment and not a Democracy one? such a goverment that can do whatever they want not caring even about what the people in their own country think? like japan and germany in WW2 for example?
amazing that even after two world wars people are still so naive, and it was only 60 years ago.
and btw, iran said many times that israel should be destroied. a very peaceful country develope nulcear, we shouldnt worry at all right?
Leave a comment:
-
Then we can lower it to a month once he admits he made a mistake.
Leave a comment:
-
that was a horrible analogy
edit: on a side note, if kim jong does try to launch nukes, i think we should give him a lifetime ban from forums
Leave a comment:
-
yea but i think uk is closer right? like on the news they said we are 750 miles away. but i think its unlikely they will use them. but now they actually have some i guess we should be a lil worried if Mr bush goes for there throats
Lets say Izor or Wark were Kim Jong-Il and his crazy side kick with a nuke and Sarien was Mr Bush who ignores united nations (TW Government) and decides to take matters into his own hands, i think izor and crazy sidekick may just launch a nuke :P
Leave a comment:
-
Eh, it's not so much that people are afraid that places like North Korea and Iran will actually use the nukes, it's more about the level of power that comes with them. Nukes are a status symbol, a bargining chip that says "hey, you can't ignore me" for a country. If Iran and North Korea develop nukes, they can't be brushed aside any more, they have to be taken seriously. Not too many over in the US like that idea.Originally posted by Mootland Farmer View PostSo America can have Nuclear Missiles and demand nobody else can have them? Is it because people are afraid of what North Korea will do? How about nobody have nukes?
Leave a comment:
-
Yes, we can.Originally posted by Mootland Farmer View PostSo America can have Nuclear Missiles and demand nobody else can have them? Is it because people are afraid of what North Korea will do? How about nobody have nukes?
Trusting in the Sanity and Restraint of the United States is not optional.
And if only the Nuclear Genie worked that way then I'm sure everyone would put it back in the bottle, but what you are asking is impossible.Last edited by Centurion; 10-10-2006, 03:38 AM.
Leave a comment:
Channels
Collapse

Leave a comment: