Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

My first warning?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Vykromond
    replied
    Originally posted by Facetious View Post
    While Money's thread about different types of girls (let's face it, it wasn't really about vaginas in particular, it just used that term to describe women) wasn't interesting or funny, and it's not like I miss it, what exactly caused it to be deleted? What does "anything of that sort" really entail? Sexism is outlawed? Repetition of crass words for the female genitalia, no good? I can't say I've ever seen a thread deleted that arbitrarily in my many years belonging to this community, so I'm just curious. Certainly, nothing in his post qualified as pornography, unless your definition of such is insanely loose.

    I have no problem with that thread being deleted, honestly, and I wouldn't have a problem if all people with similarly ignorant opinions were warned and subsequently banned if they persist. However, nothing Money said was nearly as offensive as Pummel's views on homosexuality, so it strikes me as kind of odd that a weak attempt at humor was disciplined, whereas blatant hatred of people based on their sexuality doesn't appear to have any effect on forum staff.

    I'm not trying to repost his topic. I don't have any interest in talking about different kinds of dates womanizers have, or the different terms they use to classify said dates. I just want to know why gay bashing is accepted but vague sexism is not.
    this

    Leave a comment:


  • CrvenBan
    replied
    I can't understand these people that see any kind of problems with talking about, looking at, or just thinking of the pussy.
    The pussy is most beautiful thing in the world, it's the cradle of all life. Half of human population, women, has pussy. Even some men have pussy. And those that don't, they work really hard on getting some!! So we all should rejoice in the glory of pussy, drop our pants down, pull the guns out and give it a proper salute, because all these censorship decisions have nothing to do with the pussy itself, but everything to do with the cunts making them.



    Free pussy for all !!!

    Leave a comment:


  • Ephemeral
    replied
    Originally posted by Troll King View Post
    I hope this thread doesn't get treated as a repost leading to Facetious getting reprimanded because it provided a public service by giving Money enough rope to hang himself.
    LOL

    I was going to add a post to the original thread about how inappropriate it was, glad they deleted it.

    Leave a comment:


  • Troll King
    replied
    I hope this thread doesn't get treated as a repost leading to Facetious getting reprimanded because it provided a public service by giving Money enough rope to hang himself.

    Leave a comment:


  • genocidal
    replied
    Haha well it turns out I got a warning for this too. This selective enforcement of rules is very strange, though...

    Leave a comment:


  • Zerzera
    replied
    Hail Facetious. Very good point. If you have the opinion that you have to protect children from this dirt I think it's your duty to protect them from those discriminating and narrow minded views too.

    Leave a comment:


  • Money
    replied
    my warnings

    My name is Rudy, i like big black cocks in my anal cavity.
    Last edited by Money; 02-13-2007, 11:41 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Money
    replied
    lol DG must have had a bad lesbian experience, and kim is afraid of teh pussy


    so... i have 4 warnings oh well, most of them are from some faggot, who i dont know is but they obviously are faggots must have reported me cuz i have many warnings for shit that is not against rulez, i guess thats why i havent been banned since they are bullshit


    so in good spirit



    PUSSYPUSSYPUSSYPUSSYPUSSYPUSSYPUSSYPUSSYPUSSYPUSSY PUSSYPUSSYPUSSYPUSSYPUSSYPUSSYPUSSYPUSSYPUSSYPUSSY PUSSYPUSSYPUSSYPUSSYPUSSYPUSSYPUSSYPUSSYPUSSYPUSSY PUSSYPUSSYPUSSYPUSSYPUSSYPUSSYPUSSYPUSSYPUSSYPUSSY PUSSYPUSSYPUSSYPUSSYPUSSYPUSSYPUSSYPUSSYPUSSYPUSSY PUSSYPUSSYPUSSYPUSSYPUSSYPUSSYPUSSYPUSSYPUSSYPUSSY PUSSYPUSSYPUSSYPUSSYPUSSYPUSSYPUSSYPUSSYPUSSYPUSSY PUSSYPUSSYPUSSY

    Money
    smoke something bitch

    Money's Avatar

    Join Date: Feb 2005
    Location: Houston, TX
    Posts: 1,364
    Infractions: 4/0 (0)

    Leave a comment:


  • Ewan
    replied
    It might have been something to do with the homophobia. But I dunno


    EDIT: In fact...

    Originally Posted by DangerGirl
    Dear Money,

    You have received a warning at SSCU Trench Wars Forums.

    http://www.trenchwars.org/forums/sho...d.php?p=530844

    Reason:
    -------
    Porn or Disgusting Shit

    Hi Money, posting about the "different kinds of pussy" is not appropriate for the Trench Wars forum and community. Please refrain from posting anything of the sort again.
    -------

    Warnings serve as a reminder to you of the forum's rules, which you are expected to understand and follow.

    All the best,
    SSCU Trench Wars Forums

    Leave a comment:


  • Facetious
    started a topic My first warning?

    My first warning?

    While Money's thread about different types of girls (let's face it, it wasn't really about vaginas in particular, it just used that term to describe women) wasn't interesting or funny, and it's not like I miss it, what exactly caused it to be deleted? What does "anything of that sort" really entail? Sexism is outlawed? Repetition of crass words for the female genitalia, no good? I can't say I've ever seen a thread deleted that arbitrarily in my many years belonging to this community, so I'm just curious. Certainly, nothing in his post qualified as pornography, unless your definition of such is insanely loose.

    I have no problem with that thread being deleted, honestly, and I wouldn't have a problem if all people with similarly ignorant opinions were warned and subsequently banned if they persist. However, nothing Money said was nearly as offensive as Pummel's views on homosexuality, so it strikes me as kind of odd that a weak attempt at humor was disciplined, whereas blatant hatred of people based on their sexuality doesn't appear to have any effect on forum staff.

    I'm not trying to repost his topic. I don't have any interest in talking about different kinds of dates womanizers have, or the different terms they use to classify said dates. I just want to know why gay bashing is accepted but vague sexism is not.
Working...
X