Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Urgent - Pass This On Immediately

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • 404 Not Found
    replied
    Originally posted by Pandagirl! View Post
    No, I'm not a white supremacist or racist or anything like that. I've never even heard of Ron Paul until I clicked on this thread. I went to his website to look at his platform, and just quickly glanced over the issues. From what I read there, I like him. No that doesn't mean he's getting my vote for sure, because I haven't read up on a lot of the candidates yet.
    I strongly suggest that you check out:



    See how each candidate voted and how they also lie to get elected on false promises in election campaigns.

    Leave a comment:


  • Pandagirl!
    replied
    No, I'm not a white supremacist or racist or anything like that. I've never even heard of Ron Paul until I clicked on this thread. I went to his website to look at his platform, and just quickly glanced over the issues. From what I read there, I like him. No that doesn't mean he's getting my vote for sure, because I haven't read up on a lot of the candidates yet.

    Leave a comment:


  • Squeezer
    replied
    Originally posted by Jerome Scuggs View Post
    mantra you wont like me when i'm hopped up and in mother sweden

    i will tattoo "malmo fc sucks cock" onto your swedish dickface face.

    yes.

    afterwards i will roofie my throbcock into your lovehole

    btw are you in sweden? or on vacation?
    Are you high?

    Leave a comment:


  • Jerome Scuggs
    replied
    Originally posted by Mantra-Slider View Post
    hey jerome, communitarianism pwns you


    mantra you wont like me when i'm hopped up and in mother sweden

    i will tattoo "malmo fc sucks cock" onto your swedish dickface face.

    yes.

    afterwards i will roofie my throbcock into your lovehole

    btw are you in sweden? or on vacation?

    Leave a comment:


  • MetalHeadz
    replied
    I'd certainly respect America alot more if that guy got in. It's interesting though: the perspective he has on things. He's actually more right wing than the Bush administration - he adhers wholly to the free market, non-interventionist political-economic structure. By the very nature of non-intervention, military intervention should be avoided at all costs because afterall, war is costly financially.

    Leave a comment:


  • genocidal
    replied
    Probably clueless. There's a big anti-government conservative in every election; he never wins but usually gets a sizable portion of the vote. This is the guy you vote for if you like Dick Armey and his ilk.

    There are way worse out there. In the end, I don't really see how any rational human could see the pillars of libertarianism as feasible goals. To each his own, though.

    EDIT: Panda probably likes his sappy appeals to family, fidelity, and religion. Better watch out though, Panda. Underneath his Grandpa-like demeanor is a baby-killer marriage-murderer!

    Leave a comment:


  • 404 Not Found
    replied
    Originally posted by Pandagirl! View Post
    I think Ron Paul is a good median between liberal and conservative. I'd be interested to see his stance on gay marriage and etc though... anyone know it? It wasn't on his website
    Looking at the support for Ron Paul makes me wince at the others that would support him. The unwaivering support of the White Nationalist community alone is cause for alarm.

    The White Nationalists, “White Pride World Wide.” If you check out any of the White Nationalist web forums you will find Paul being defined as the “last hope” of our country. Something is just off when a mainstream candidate provokes more love than hate from racists. (Mind you, these people are different than White Supremacists, but they do advocate for the removal of non-whites from the U.S., and blame Jews for everything. Instead of killing off all other races, though, they just want to remove them from this country.)

    the White Nationalist movement are amongst Ron Pauls’ most fervent supporters on the internet and in general.

    While Paul has high marks in my book for honesty, I see him for what he is: a very conservative libertarian who would love to drastically remap our entire country. And for that reason, I could never support his candidacy. What turns me off the most are the people that follow him and seem to be under his spell, such as the John Birchers, 9/11 Truthers, anarchists, and white nationalists, they all adore him. People and the world think Bush has been bad? Uhg. So Panda...do you hate specific races as much as the rest of Paul's supporters or are you just clueless about the backing of this man?

    Leave a comment:


  • Mantra-Slider
    replied
    hey jerome, communitarianism pwns you


    Leave a comment:


  • Epinephrine
    replied
    LOL at any candidate endorsed by TONE.

    For shits and giggles, I decided to read Ron Paul's website... I've never seen so much rhetoric without actual policies for a long time. I like all the random rhetoric not based in reality. One example would be how he wants to pull the US out of the UN so that the US can't be 'forced into wars by an unelected body' completely ignoring the fact that the UN can't FORCE anyone to declare war on anyone else, and that the US has a veto on the security council which basically means that any war that the UN authorizes is supported BY THE US. Then there's all his rhetoric about lowering taxes, but still preserving social security (which is the largest drain on taxes in the country) somehow. There's the whole part about how the federal reserve bank is bad and how the FDA is bad, but with no actual solutions to how safety in pharmaceuticals would be managed or how the best way that that we've found to manage the economy in a post gold-standard world would be replaced. Finally there's the stuff about the NAFTA superhighway that would make even Tone have a wet dream.

    What a douche.

    Leave a comment:


  • a21ozcoldcup
    replied
    Originally posted by Tone View Post
    I had to come out of Forum Vacation to post this Critical Video



    150,000 views in 24 hours
    Urgent!!! Presidential election is happening so soon!!!! nEED UR VOTES NOW!


    But seriously. If Hillary gets it I'm fucking leaving the country. Fucking hypocritical, ass kissing, two faced bitch. At least her husband was funny.

    Ron Paul or Obama sound good. So far. Though if I had a choice, it would just be some random joe that has some common sense, works for a living, holds a degree and served in the military (and isn't rich or poor).

    Leave a comment:


  • Pandagirl!
    replied
    I think Ron Paul is a good median between liberal and conservative. I'd be interested to see his stance on gay marriage and etc though... anyone know it? It wasn't on his website

    Leave a comment:


  • Jerome Scuggs
    replied
    Originally posted by Pandagirl! View Post
    I like Ron Paul better than any of the other candidates.
    no offense, but this worries me

    Leave a comment:


  • Pandagirl!
    replied
    I like Ron Paul better than any of the other candidates.

    Leave a comment:


  • DoTheFandango
    replied
    Originally posted by Squeezer View Post
    I'm thinking we're going to have to organize a mass bail/ drug binge if Hilary Clinton takes office.
    Plan: Jerome commits identity theft against aging neo-con. I fly to Shreveport, take out car under falsely acquired credit card. We drive to Seattle, being on no less than 1 windowpane of acid while in the car at all times. I'll pick you up, we hop over to British Colombia and live like kings.

    Leave a comment:


  • 404 Not Found
    replied
    Originally posted by Material Girl View Post
    So glad you could grace us with your profound insight.

    Call me a simpleton... but I think that because of the current political climate in North America, we're going to be in a pretty iffy global position for quite a long time, so it would be nice to have some strategic diplomacy at the top... food not bombs? Imagine how effective a president can be when they can consult with a partner that has already experienced it and done it well?
    Keep in mind that when the vote in the Senate was given to allow the President to invade Iraq based upon intelligence reports that we now know are flawed, Hillary voted in favor of the invasion and it was only a year ago that it was disclosed that she never read the pre-war intelligence that led to the Senate vote.

    So to borrow a phrase

    it would be nice to have some strategic diplomacy at the top... food not bombs?
    Keep in mind Hillary was one of the dumbass Senators of the U.S. that failed on her vote and haphazard style of politics of letting someone else do her thinking for her. It was one of her aids that read the pre-war intelligence reports and then told her about it and never Hillary herself on such an improtant issue that led this country to war. Nice job and this is someone people want as a President...add more deceipt to the proverbial fire.

    Then you have Hillary calling Obama naive? Um...how can someone call another naive about issues, yet she lived in denial of Bill f'n around on her since the days of Bill being Gov. of Arkansas. Frankly, Obama's is a fresh start and perhaps not jaded by the so-called "experience" Hillary procalims that is needed for the Presidency. Yet Hillary goes after Obama this past week for not even casting a vote on the specific Iranian branch of the Iranian military as a terrorist faction ...and again Hillary didn't even read the pre-war intelligence that led this nation to war and an illegal occupation of Iraq.

    Hillary is playing the typical political B.S. that happens during a campaign. Unfortunately 95% of the peoples in the U.S. will never take the time to see how these people have voted in the past that is open for anyone to read and plainly see.

    Hillary is a hypocrite to the enth degree.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X