One thing that I always hear from conferences I have attended in my field is that people are better off with the undergraduate degree and then getting a job with the firm/company they have interest in. Then have the firm send them for continuing education and the Masters Degree.
The only reason I make note of this, is that I have friends as well as workers that have been turned down by other firms due to being over qualified with no experience. Hence the degree calls for a higher salary, so why hire someone with a masters in this or that when I can hire someone for 1/2 - 1/3 the cost and then send them to school with the company paying for it.
I would definately hire and undergrad over a grad student in the Architectural field. Especially if they hold no working experience and only hold a degree from a University.
I guess it boils down to the subject matter of what the degree is for and the job applications you'll use it for in the end run.
The only reason I make note of this, is that I have friends as well as workers that have been turned down by other firms due to being over qualified with no experience. Hence the degree calls for a higher salary, so why hire someone with a masters in this or that when I can hire someone for 1/2 - 1/3 the cost and then send them to school with the company paying for it.
I would definately hire and undergrad over a grad student in the Architectural field. Especially if they hold no working experience and only hold a degree from a University.
I guess it boils down to the subject matter of what the degree is for and the job applications you'll use it for in the end run.
Comment