http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/new...cle4232264.ece
hey, Europe! now the US can look at YOUR private data too! Thanks to the EU.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
jerome t. scuggs' weekly politix thread
Collapse
X
-
its not about winning and losing, you should really learn what your talking about (edit: when your right)Originally posted by ShadowHand View Postyou really need to learn how to argue heroin.
"i'm right and you're an idiot" really won't win you too many
p.s. staff still blows
Leave a comment:
-
thank you for your very useful inputOriginally posted by Cylor View PostYeah man, why doesn't the government listen to you? Man, I am so glad you brought this to my attention!! I am so sad I was banned because like, this is very important shit being discussed here. Verry im-por-tan-t shiiiiiit. I just can't fathom, how could The Man ever neglect my best interest?
THIS IS UNTENABLE.
Leave a comment:
-
you really need to learn how to argue heroin.Originally posted by Heroin Bob View Postso your proposing we put him in a violent crimes prison yard in a dress and makeup and allow gang rape from about 20 people?
he left a young girl bloodied and mutilated, and thats just her outward appearance. this guy deserves to die. your a piece of shit
"i'm right and you're an idiot" really won't win you too many
Leave a comment:
-
Yeah man, why doesn't the government listen to you? Man, I am so glad you brought this to my attention!! I am so sad I was banned because like, this is very important shit being discussed here. Verry im-por-tan-t shiiiiiit. I just can't fathom, how could The Man ever neglect my best interest?
THIS IS UNTENABLE.
Leave a comment:
-
Well I hope if we drill offshore that another large country doesn't claim it as "their oil" and there becomes a large squabble that results in another useless war or potentially WW3 if its a big nation. Honestly, we should focus on developing that whole alternative energy source thing; you know like the space power satellite and that kinda stuff. I mean what better way to pay off a humongous national debt than to develop the hottest commodity? Hey but what do I know about supply and demand right?
Anyways on a less serious note, you should all fear the week when Diablo 3 comes out. All the nerds that run this country will disappear into their caves for a week, we should be prepared for invasion or terrorist attacks.
Leave a comment:
-
The warmer water is, the more it expands, thus higher sea levels.Originally posted by DankNuggets View Postreally? seems like this would be bigger news. I wonder if that applies to ice shelves? or if they even have them in the artic. I know people complained about polar ice melting and raising sea levels, but most of that ice is already floating, and therefore displacing as much water as it ever will.
On another note, less ice = more light gets into water = more carbon fixation = possible check/balance to global warming?
Note #2: it is now 2:30 EDT, i'm betting that the timestamp says 2:46
Note #3: why again did the calendar die 12/07? and could it be fixed along with the time?
Ice is white and thus reflects heat, water takes it in. This means once the ice is gone, the water will heat up at a much faster rate than it did while frozen.
More carbon fixation? What are you talking about? There will also be increased deserts as well, and large areas of the ocean will be too warm to sustain life (as the warmer water is, the less gases will dissolve into it).
Leave a comment:
-
really? seems like this would be bigger news. I wonder if that applies to ice shelves? or if they even have them in the artic. I know people complained about polar ice melting and raising sea levels, but most of that ice is already floating, and therefore displacing as much water as it ever will.Originally posted by 404 Not Found View PostOn an environmental note, the Artic circle for the 1st time in recorded history as well as scientific study, note this will be the 1st time the polar ice cap completely melts.
On another note, less ice = more light gets into water = more carbon fixation = possible check/balance to global warming?
Note #2: it is now 2:30 EDT, i'm betting that the timestamp says 2:46
Note #3: why again did the calendar die 12/07? and could it be fixed along with the time?
Leave a comment:
-
Huh? You're making up stuff.Originally posted by Heroin Bob View Postagreed with supreme court being dousche bags. remember the elites in washington will always know more than them cajuns.
also
if your pro environment, as you say you are, wouldn't you want us doing our drilling instead of people using sub par tech in a forest some where creating multitudes more pollution? or are you just for the environment you can see around you and do not really care about earth but also like to wear those 'go green' shirts....
off note, any one see pelosi going coocoo for fairness doctrine? stupid bitch
I think the environment is MUCH more important than driving some extra miles every day. I think the quality of life gained by a stable and healthy environment for the Earth far outweighs the quality of life gained by further economic benefits gained by producing more CO2 once you past a certain quality of life (of which the western world has passed a long time ago). That said, economic development respectful of the environment in terms of all types of pollution and sustainability is always welcome.
Leave a comment:
-
On an environmental note, the Artic circle for the 1st time in recorded history as well as scientific study, note this will be the 1st time the polar ice cap completely melts.
Who's up for some top of the world sailing?
We can argue on the death penalty until we are blue in the face, but we are giving everyone on the planet the death penalty it seems with the ignorance and avoidance of such a topic of our environment.
We can seek for a planet similar to Earth in our galaxy and spend billions on the research to do so, yet we can't even take care of this planet.
F'd up world that WE ALL live in.
When the power of love overcomes the love of power the world will know peace. - Jimi Hendrix.
Leave a comment:
-
This is a decent enough thread so either be respectful or you can enjoy a forum vacation. I don't think capital punishment is an appropriate punishment for anything less then at least manslaughter or murder if it is ever used. 45 US States agree and have removed it as a punishment for any crime less then murder. No one has been convicted and sentenced to death for rape since 1967. If he were convicted and sentenced based on attempted murder along with rape of a minor then it wouldn't be an issue.Originally posted by Heroin Bob View Postso your proposing we put him in a violent crimes prison yard in a dress and makeup and allow gang rape from about 20 people?
he left a young girl bloodied and mutilated, and thats just her outward appearance. this guy deserves to die. your a piece of shit
That's what is feared out of this Nuggets. It opens the door for people to challenge existing federal and state bans on weapons no private citizen should have access to.Last edited by Kolar; 06-27-2008, 12:15 PM.
Leave a comment:
-
and capital punishment - i can't say too much on recent (within past 7 yrs) changes to policy, but i wrote like a 20 pg paper on the topic back in school (bet everyone did).
There's two ways to be charged for a capital crime: by the federal gov't, or by the states themseleves. Certain states have chosen to forego the death penalty, but any criminal could be charged for a federal capital crime, regardless of where they lived in the US. Most states have chosen to end capital punisment because too many death row inmates were exonerated by DNA evidence. Other states continue to use the penalty because they say they can now be even more sure because of DNA testing.
To make a crime a capital crime, you basically have to kill someone. There are other ways to get the death penalty, but they are remnents of older legislation that isn't used today (with maybe the exception of treason as applied to terrorism). Federally you have to commit murder 1 to get it I believe, whereas states allow it based on qualifying for say 2 out of 7 aggrevations to the crime. These could be kidnapping, rape, kidnapping with a weapon or accross state lines, and a number of other things. But in all of those cases, the victim must have been killed for the person to be sent to death row.
In the instance of raping a young girl and leaving her to die, that could possibly fall under the "aggravating circumstances" that I was talking about. In theory, the defendant could be given the death penalty, but in practice it hasn't happend in over 60 years. You have to decide for yourself if attempted murder should be treated as seriously as murder one. Who's to say that in their head they wanted to kill that person. No matter how fucked up what they did was, that implication is usually what gets you the death penalty. A lack of remorse helps, too.
Leave a comment:
Channels
Collapse

Leave a comment: