Infractions

[Lizard Fuel]

Infractions: 1/3 (62)

Suck it money.

Edit: I just got over a month ban without infraction points added. Can I get a few extra please?

[Money]

ur weak

[PaulOakenfold]

daasfd

[PaulOakenfold]

1/0 (0) :cat:

[gran guerrero]

1/0 (0) :cat:

:santa:

[PH]

0/1 (6)

rookies.

[Xog]

0/1 (6)

rookies.

2/0 (0)

i dunno what that means

[soup]

what do those numbers mean?

[gran guerrero]

1/2 (12)

[duel pasta]

I cna't see it so I guess I dont have any?

[DankNuggets]

i think mine went away i used to see numbers like that

[Chino]

0/1 (6)

what does this mean?

aquatiq angry for me posting cuntpunch image? <_<

[kthx]

Infractions: 0/2 (106)

gg newbies.

[Zerzera]

My infraction bugs the hell out of me. It's one that never expires while I still think it's an unjust warning.
It bugs the hell out of me because I was warned by Facetious, the guy who went crazy when someone got warned/banned for sexism towards DangerGirl or something and kept whining about change until he was made moderator.

yeah you can make fun of gays and women all you want on the forums but racism is illegal

people being allowed to say faggot bugs me personally but for some reason that originated with priitk or dock it is allowed

nothing ward said was quite as bad as calling middle eastern folks camel jockeys essentially anyway

just a warning

While Money's thread about different types of girls (let's face it, it wasn't really about vaginas in particular, it just used that term to describe women) wasn't interesting or funny, and it's not like I miss it, what exactly caused it to be deleted? What does "anything of that sort" really entail? Sexism is outlawed? Repetition of crass words for the female genitalia, no good? I can't say I've ever seen a thread deleted that arbitrarily in my many years belonging to this community, so I'm just curious. Certainly, nothing in his post qualified as pornography, unless your definition of such is insanely loose.

I have no problem with that thread being deleted, honestly, and I wouldn't have a problem if all people with similarly ignorant opinions were warned and subsequently banned if they persist. However, nothing Money said was nearly as offensive as Pummel's views on homosexuality, so it strikes me as kind of odd that a weak attempt at humor was disciplined, whereas blatant hatred of people based on their sexuality doesn't appear to have any effect on forum staff.

I'm not trying to repost his topic. I don't have any interest in talking about different kinds of dates womanizers have, or the different terms they use to classify said dates. I just want to know why gay bashing is accepted but vague sexism is not.

yes, folks, zerzera gets so worked up about forum warnings that he takes the time to send private messages to moderators about them

[PjOtTeR]

I only have 2 infractions... they both had the same time, I think it was when I did this... Eventhough I am still mad about that since my posts where all about the topics at hand and thus got removed for no reason... yet I was drunk as fuck so I dont remember what I typed in every 1 of them...