Bailout bill

[Izor]

My place in society is to defend this country. Whats yours? Finding the best way to throw your vote away in the Canadian election? K you're still way more interested in the way people like me cast my vote than I am the way you cast yours

I say 'were in this together' but really I meant 'you're going to suffer worse as a result of us suffering'

[Capital Knockers]

My place in society is to defend this country. Whats yours? Finding the best way to throw your vote away in the Canadian election? K you're still way more interested in the way people like me cast my vote than I am the way you cast yours

I say 'were in this together' but really I meant 'you're going to suffer worse as a result of us suffering'

Great job, defending your country from evil Canadian forums go-ers. I'm sure your fellow Americans are glad you're surfing these forums so they can sleep safely and soundly at night.

Honestly. Take a look at the news, I don't see Canadians losing their homes to banks left right and center. If you had two fucking braincells you'd know voting, and being informed to make that vote isn't a waste at all. I don't give a fuck how YOU vote, in fact, I hope you don't. You'd most likely make a stupid choice. I'm also glad you don't care about Canadian politics, or Canada in general, because your exactly the type of American we hate. I hope something comes along to purge you arrogant fuckwads from the face of the earth. (edit - not all Americans, just the idiots like Izor that are destroying an otherwise lovely country.)

[Izor]

lol cause clearly i meant that in the sense of my role in the society of these forums.

The point I was making is that you're dependent on us completely, but the opposite cannot be said about us with you. If we were both steadily increasing economically, and then canada started to go to shit, our economy would take a hit but its nothing like the hit you are already taking with us faltering

[Zerzera]

My place in society is to defend this country.

Enforcing the policies of Bush is not what I would define as defending your country. But he's only figuratively destroying your country I guess.
As long as people's lives are destroyed, rather than them actually being killed. Is that the only concept of terrorism you grasp?

Thank God there is at least one fail-safe mechanism that I am quite confident won't fail; Bush will have no more terms as president.

[DankNuggets]

Thank God there is at least one fail-safe mechanism that I am quite confident won't fail; Bush will have no more terms as president.

Finally something republicans and democrats can agree on

Too bad there's a good chance his personnel could weasel their way back into washington

[Jerome Scuggs]

Finally something republicans and democrats can agree on

Too bad there's a good chance his personnel could weasel their way back into washington

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/01/ny...=1&oref=slogin

don't be too sure of anything these days. people are finding all sorts of exceptions to rules.

[DankNuggets]

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/01/ny...=1&oref=slogin

don't be too sure of anything these days. people are finding all sorts of exceptions to rules.

well the people like him, and it's not barred by the constitution, just local law

i think we could order up a nation-wide lynch mob to get bush out of the white house if he pulled some stunt. i don't really think he wants the job anyway, though he's probably used to the general population hating him by now.

[Izor]

I'm pretty sure liberals will never gather a mob to go after anyone, because liberal goes hand in hand with pussy bitch. They'll chain themselves to trees to prevent cutting down forests or jump out in front of vehicles to get them to stop, but outright violence? Doubtful

[DankNuggets]

I'm pretty sure liberals will never gather a mob to go after anyone, because liberal goes hand in hand with pussy bitch. They'll chain themselves to trees to prevent cutting down forests or jump out in front of vehicles to get them to stop, but outright violence? Doubtful

do you have any fucking clue what the word liberal means?

do you have any fucking clue what bush's approval rating is?

do you have any fucking clue what a CONSERVATIVE would do if a president tried to override an amendment to the Constitution?


well i'll concede the last one b/c bush's 'conservative' self wants to butt fuck the constitution so maybe you've lost sight of what it is to be conservative.

if you really had a handle of these words 'liberal' and 'conservative' you'd know that a good bit of the stupid shit republicans do is actually quite LIBERAL. Why? becuase they've taken upon themselves to CHANGE the way our GOVT works by involving themselves in matters that should be left out of the GOVT to begin with.

The only difference is that you consider LIBERAL republicans conservative because they want to change things to serve themselves

LIBERAL democrats suggest the SAME degree of change, just to serve others, not themselves.

So really, LIBERAL goes hand in hand with stepping up and helping others, something that actually takes responsibility, unlike the pussy republicans who are only out for their own selves.

And what's the difference between millions of people descending upon the white house grounds and chaining themselves to trees? It's not like it would take ANY actual violence to depose Bush if he refused to leave office. Even his own generals would probably shy away from supporting him then - he's not quite to dictator status yet. Maybe lynch-mob is the wrong word, but I'm positive both republican and democrats wouldn't let anyone, even Jesus himself, serve more than 2 terms as a president.

[kthx]

do you have any fucking clue what the word liberal means?

do you have any fucking clue what bush's approval rating is?

do you have any fucking clue what a CONSERVATIVE would do if a president tried to override an amendment to the Constitution?


well i'll concede the last one b/c bush's 'conservative' self wants to butt fuck the constitution so maybe you've lost sight of what it is to be conservative.

if you really had a handle of these words 'liberal' and 'conservative' you'd know that a good bit of the stupid shit republicans do is actually quite LIBERAL. Why? becuase they've taken upon themselves to CHANGE the way our GOVT works by involving themselves in matters that should be left out of the GOVT to begin with.

The only difference is that you consider LIBERAL republicans conservative because they want to change things to serve themselves

LIBERAL democrats suggest the SAME degree of change, just to serve others, not themselves.

So really, LIBERAL goes hand in hand with stepping up and helping others, something that actually takes responsibility, unlike the pussy republicans who are only out for their own selves.

And what's the difference between millions of people descending upon the white house grounds and chaining themselves to trees? It's not like it would take ANY actual violence to depose Bush if he refused to leave office. Even his own generals would probably shy away from supporting him then - he's not quite to dictator status yet. Maybe lynch-mob is the wrong word, but I'm positive both republican and democrats wouldn't let anyone, even Jesus himself, serve more than 2 terms as a president.

Basically the entire idea behind liberalism is, "Who needs to teach a man to fish, we can just give him a fish every day"

Hell if the US becomes socialist I am going to quit my job or do really terribly at it, and then complain that it isn't fair that I lost my job and have no money because it is too hard.

[Zerzera]

Basically the entire idea behind liberalism is, "Who needs to teach a man to fish, we can just give him a fish every day".

Nope

[kthx]

the real reason, and yes.

[Zerzera]

the real reason, and yes.

The false agenda? Then it could be, I have no wizard to inform me.

[kthx]

It is impossible to put a definition on an ideal such as Liberalism or Conservatism, the best we can do is try to explain the basic foundation of the ideal. Because there is no true definition to a thought that millions of people might share, but to different degrees.

[Fluffz]

It is impossible to put a definition on an ideal such as Liberalism or Conservatism, the best we can do is try to explain the basic foundation of the ideal. Because there is no true definition to a thought that millions of people might share, but to different degrees.

What? Lies! Of course there is a definition that isnt pulled out of your ass and that definition is not altered by your random interpretation at all.