All right, well i've got 3 questions, but here's one.
1) You are videotaping a race from a stand 132 ft from the track, following a car that is moving 264ft/sec. How fast will your camera angle (theta) be changing when the car is in front of you.
Ok heres what i have so far:
dx/dt= -264 ft/sec
at x=0
y=132
Ok so i know i have to create a relationship, so...:
x^2(haha phizey) + 132 = z^2
xdx/dt+ydy/dt=zdz/dt // now i will substitute
So i get like z*dz/dt=0, what the fuck? // since im looking for x=0
Then i was thinking this..just friggin input dx/dt as the length of x (to find theta).
tan theta = 264/132. So i get theta=63.43
But the answer is 2 radians, and im getting 2 radians right here. But this can't be the right way.
I know i have to differentiate implicitly for time, so i get like
so I know tan theta= y/x
y=132, so 132tan(theta)=1/x
differentiate:
132sec^2(theta)*dtheta/dt=1/x^2*dx/dt
WOULD I PLUG THETA BACK IN? QUESTION MARK QUESTION MARK
1) You are videotaping a race from a stand 132 ft from the track, following a car that is moving 264ft/sec. How fast will your camera angle (theta) be changing when the car is in front of you.
Ok heres what i have so far:
dx/dt= -264 ft/sec
at x=0
y=132
Ok so i know i have to create a relationship, so...:
x^2(haha phizey) + 132 = z^2
xdx/dt+ydy/dt=zdz/dt // now i will substitute
So i get like z*dz/dt=0, what the fuck? // since im looking for x=0
Then i was thinking this..just friggin input dx/dt as the length of x (to find theta).
tan theta = 264/132. So i get theta=63.43
But the answer is 2 radians, and im getting 2 radians right here. But this can't be the right way.
I know i have to differentiate implicitly for time, so i get like
so I know tan theta= y/x
y=132, so 132tan(theta)=1/x
differentiate:
132sec^2(theta)*dtheta/dt=1/x^2*dx/dt
WOULD I PLUG THETA BACK IN? QUESTION MARK QUESTION MARK
Comment