Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
economic poopfest
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Eric is God View PostResearch In Motion is still going strong. At a time when AT&T, Sprint, Apple, Microsoft and other big tech companies are laying off thousands, I haven't heard of a single layoff and still over 1,000 open job postings on our website. After 2 years here my team has gone from 2 people to 12, with 4 job recs still open for subscriber and churn analysts.-Dave
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Foreign View PostIf you think the net 2,000 Microsoft layoffs were directly related to the economic downturn, think again. In a "down" year they just banked $20,000,000,000
CAT declared record revenue for the final quarter in 2008 (results came on Jan 26 2009)
then they continued to lay off more people and the grand total is well over 20,000
big profit one year does not translate to the same outlook the next. they see trouble coming so they trim the fat, just like everyone else.
in big business there is one thing to remember, stockholders always win.
1996 Minnesota State Pooping Champion
Comment
-
Originally posted by Zeebu View Postwhat are you talking about?
CAT declared record revenue for the final quarter in 2008 (results came on Jan 26 2009)
then they continued to lay off more people and the grand total is well over 20,000
big profit one year does not translate to the same outlook the next. they see trouble coming so they trim the fat, just like everyone else.
in big business there is one thing to remember, stockholders always win.-Dave
Comment
-
Originally posted by Foreign View PostI think the most significant part of MSFT laying off 5,000 people is the 3,000 new openings they're now hiring for. They're increasing the value of their work-force. They have fat they would be better off trimming recession or not. If they were worried they'd be letting go probably 10 times that many people. 2,000 net layoffs is a joke. Let's assume an average salary w/ benefits of $60k, that's $120 million worth of salaries. We'll say those people on average were worth $30k to the company per year, so that's $60 million we can subtract. Add on whatever MSFT was paying in insurance and taxes on those 2,000 employees, and we're still only talking like $100 million with those generous numbers. That's half of a percent. Let's also say the 3,000 they hire are on average 1.5 times as productive as those who left on the same pay scale (or you could assume they are just as valuable at 75% pay). That would bring their not loss to around $50 million (1/4 of a percent). Not news.
Comment
Channels
Collapse
Comment