This always puzzles me. You see, velocity is relative, which means that if I am moving 5m/s away from you, that is the same as you are moving 5m/s from me.
So if person A indeed can travel 50 years in 1 day using person B's time frame, then since velocity is relative, person B at the same time can travel 50 years in 1 day using person A's time frame.
But that is a paradox.
I know you are going to argue that the important thing we have to consider is who is actually in the inertia frame. But does such a inertia frame exist? So far as I am aware of 'inertia frames' in physics are all arbitary, they are not universal.
So unless this 'inertia frame' thing is solved, time travel looks more like fairy tale to me.
So if person A indeed can travel 50 years in 1 day using person B's time frame, then since velocity is relative, person B at the same time can travel 50 years in 1 day using person A's time frame.
But that is a paradox.
I know you are going to argue that the important thing we have to consider is who is actually in the inertia frame. But does such a inertia frame exist? So far as I am aware of 'inertia frames' in physics are all arbitary, they are not universal.
So unless this 'inertia frame' thing is solved, time travel looks more like fairy tale to me.
Comment