Are people stupid

[TelC@t]

Yes, in my mind, most of the people are .... for example:

When some producers of perfumes/cosmetics say that their products are 'against animal testing', many idiots who call themselves 'have strong moral sense' would instantly recognise the company as being 'responsible'.

I mean, wtf, they didn't test it on the animal, so did it test on the human ... but that is a violation of human right, isn't it? Now say if they did not test it on the animal, and did not test it on human and they sell those product to us. Then what the heck ... are we the consumers, guinea pigs who pay money to get their newb product tested on us?

Retarded, RETARDED!!!

2nd of all, I think Government and mafia share a lot in common. Think about it: people pay mafia 'protedtion fees' and government 'taxes' to protect them from getting 'unrightfully' violated. And if you don't pay the $$$, haha, in mafia case, you get beat up, in govornment case: you go to prison.


3rd: computer virus: they are good in the overall development of computer technologies.

Why? think about it ... software companies like microsoft don't spend enough money in testing ... so there are millions of loophles in their products. They don't give a damn about their consumers, expect for how to get the most money out of their pockets.

It is those computer virus programmers, who are the really testing engineers who help the software gaints like microsoft to plug their holes.

I hope Microsoft getting sued for tortious neglecgence (law students/lawyers would know what I am talkling about).

[TelC@t]

hahaha, personally I think I am more brillant when I am drunk ... like now.


if you flame on my opinions above without a valid reason, you instantly go on to my list of 'dispised people', but of course your thoughtful contribution to the subject is respected and appreciated.

Once I was asked why don't I show respect to some of the other players, to which I replied:

'I respect who ever earns my respect ... it doesn't come free'

[King Missile]

why do you even bother?

[Zloy]

Heh, isn't it annoying when drunk people start talking about politics and such crap

[arrogance]

Telcat isn't real. You're being messed with.

[eehh]

[Jerome Scuggs]

theres a guy named malthus who thinks like you telcat. except he wants to destroy asia so us americans will 'have more air'. i will pay for a no-return trip to china, if you would so kindly oblige.

[Kim]

I think this Malthus individual is a fucking retard and should be castrated.

[bloodzombie]

I was almost gonna reply with reasons why this post is retarded, but then I realized it was telcat, so I won't bother.

[Facetious]

Telcat, you're boring.

[ConcreteSchlyrd]

Re: Are people stupid

As always, you're completely retarded.

Originally posted by TelC@t
When some producers of perfumes/cosmetics say that their products are 'against animal testing', many idiots who call themselves 'have strong moral sense' would instantly recognise the company as being 'responsible'.

I mean, wtf, they didn't test it on the animal, so did it test on the human ... but that is a violation of human right, isn't it? Now say if they did not test it on the animal, and did not test it on human and they sell those product to us. Then what the heck ... are we the consumers, guinea pigs who pay money to get their newb product tested on us?]

Why do you make one assumption then jump to conclusions? As with most things that you "debate" on this board, a simple web search could begin to answer your questions. Thirty seconds after I read this post, I did a search for alternatives to animal testing and came up with 305,000 hits. That's a lot of information that you conveniently neglect.

If any "human testing" goes on, it's the kind where people get paid to do it. The job I work at does it all the time. It's not like the companies have hit squads of marksmen walking around with sniper rifles, drugging and kidnapping random percentages of the populace. Dumb, dumb, dumb.

Originally posted by TelC@t
Retarded, RETARDED!!!

Couldn't have captured your post any clearer.

Originally posted by TelC@t
2nd of all, I think Government and mafia share a lot in common. Think about it: people pay mafia 'protedtion fees' and government 'taxes' to protect them from getting 'unrightfully' violated. And if you don't pay the $$$, haha, in mafia case, you get beat up, in govornment case: you go to prison.

I'm sorry, did the mafia come and plow my street yesterday morning when a foot of snow decided to deposit itself on my city? I must've slept through all the tommy gun fire. Yes, you pay money to the government for protection, but it's not "mafia protection". In return for taxes, there are a lot of social/educational/public works/whatever plans that are funded. I thought that everyone knew this, but evidently Australia has decided to educate it's population using only the Sweet Valley High compilation and a used VHS of Scarface.

Originally posted by TelC@t
3rd: computer virus: they are good in the overall development of computer technologies.

Spoken like someone with little-to-no grasp of working network/systems administration.

Originally posted by TelC@t
Why? think about it ... software companies like microsoft don't spend enough money in testing ... so there are millions of loophles in their products. They don't give a damn about their consumers, expect for how to get the most money out of their pockets.

I have never seen one piece of truly bulletproof code. Period. And since you're hinting at Microsoft being the bad guy here, let's turn it around. You know how many times I've had to patch the SGIs around my office this past year? (Better question is, do you know what an SGI is?) By the time you get done with device driver updates and kernel rebuilds, you're back up to the same amount of time spent patching all the MS machines.

Bottom line: Software companies usually try to write the best code they can to achieve a certain ends. But no matter how many hundreds (or small handfuls) of programmers that you have working on a project, there are always going to be millions of people who have nothing better to do than to break it.

Originally posted by TelC@t
It is those computer virus programmers, who are the really testing engineers who help the software gaints like microsoft to plug their holes.

Again, wrong. You're making the assumption that virus authors are just people who want to bring attention to flaws in a system. SO WRONG. Let's take a quick look at the two sides of the coin:

Good hackers (or "white hats", as the media likes to call them) notice flaws in OSes/applications/whatever and notify the developer in a quiet fashion. This usually gives the developer time to work with the "white hat" to fix the vulnerability.

Virus authors bring attention to flaws, exploit them, then use the exploit to advance their own personal gain. Take last week's net bombardment of the Novarg/Mydoom virus. The whole intention was to create zombies to dDOS SCO (and with the later strain, SCO and Microsoft). Now you tell me, what good does that do? Virus authors don't help anything, not at all.

Originally posted by TelC@t
I hope Microsoft getting sued for tortious neglecgence (law students/lawyers would know what I am talkling about).

No, no one ever knows what the fuck you're talking about.

[Jerome Scuggs]

i mean, its not like microsoft sits down with Phr34k_hack3r666 and asks him what viruses he will be making this year. Microsoft cant predict them all, so viruses are inevitable.

kim, dont worry, he is crazy

oh, and on the animal testing - yeah yeah, just look at the shit chemically. they do that shit now.

and the government-mafia thing - you're fucking dumb.

edit: kim, heres a link to one of his essays.
http://www.ac.wwu.edu/~stephan/malthus/malthus.0.html

[Jerome Scuggs]

Originally posted by TelC@t
'I respect who ever earns my respect ... it doesn't come free'

neither do your 'services'

[froedrick]

Originally posted by TelC@t
hahaha, personally I think I am more brillant when I am drunk

You must think the world of yourself you ego centric vaginal tick.

Originally posted by TelC@t
if you flame on my opinions above without a valid reason, you instantly go on to my list of 'dispised people', but of course your thoughtful contribution to the subject is respected and appreciated.

Conc's response was thoughtful and contributed to showing how 'brilliant' you really are... drunk or sober.


p.s. nice once jerome

[aussie]

Telcat, it seems as if all you do is sit at home and drink, which makes me think that you should probably get out of your house more, and then maybe you would realise things that everyone else already knows, therefore not making such an ass out of yourself.

Wait, that can't be helped, can it?

Maybe you should just stop posting, coz everytime that you post, what you say just gets dumber and dumber, and makes even less sense than the last time you wrote something..

Doesn't that tell you anything?!