Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Winamps.

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Winamps.

    Do I want to upgrade to 5.02?


    ????? and all this work on the forum and still no spell check????
    "Bilbo" SS is a sophisticated chat channel, nothing more.

  • #2
    I prefer winamp2 to all of them. But winamp 5 is lighter than winamp 3
    Winamp 2 is the one that demands the less memory

    Sooo... Winamp 2 > Winamp 5 > Winamp 3 > mushrooms (i hate mushrooms)
    A little bit of Trench Wars in your life
    BasingCrew
    .com
    My space

    Comment


    • #3
      Winamp 5 is awesome, in my opinion. I'll go compare them and hit up an analysis later.
      DELETED

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by Gedeon
        I prefer winamp2 to all of them. But winamp 5 is lighter than winamp 3
        Winamp 2 is the one that demands the less memory

        Sooo... Winamp 2 > Winamp 5 > Winamp 3 > mushrooms (i hate mushrooms)

        Huh
        Winamp 5 idling in classic mode is about 2megs memory give or take, which is the same as or comparable to Winamp 2. On the other hand you've got all the pretty skins from Winamp 3, and the new media library option which rocks (especially since winamp 2 chokes on the new Enhanced Audio CDs).

        In my mind there's little reason not to upgrade (stability and feature wise), unless you have a craptacular hunk of computer running minimal memory and win98 or winME.

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by wadi
          Huh
          Winamp 5 idling in classic mode is about 2megs memory give or take, which is the same as or comparable to Winamp 2. On the other hand you've got all the pretty skins from Winamp 3, and the new media library option which rocks (especially since winamp 2 chokes on the new Enhanced Audio CDs).

          In my mind there's little reason not to upgrade (stability and feature wise), unless you have a craptacular hunk of computer running minimal memory and win98 or winME.
          When I use winamp 2, my computer runs normally. It takes about no time to open it. Unfortunately, when I tryed winamp 5, it was slower and it took arround 4-5 seconds for it to open. So I judged that Winamp 5 was a bit more demanding than Winamp 2. I guess that doesn't matter if you have a good computer; I have an old piece of crap :/
          A little bit of Trench Wars in your life
          BasingCrew
          .com
          My space

          Comment


          • #6
            Winamp5 defaults to Modern skins when you start it, and that will hit you up for 10-15 more megs of ram easy. You'll get better mileage if you switch to classic skins, but yes it should still be a bit more resource heavy than winamp2, mostly because of the new media lib options. It's a choice you'll have to weigh I suppose.

            Comment


            • #7
              I don't know why anyone would use anything besides the old, classic skin anyways. It's not like you're going to be staring at Winamp while the song is playing.

              With Winamp 5 on classic mode, I can't even tell the difference between it and Winamp 2.xx, so I may as well use it. I don't use any of the visual effects shit or anything, and it is just as fast as Winamp 2 was.
              sdg

              Comment


              • #8
                From what i've heard, winamp 5 is winamp 2 plus the skinning engine of winamp 3. I think they junked the rest of winamp 3 (which was a rewrite) as it sucked so badly. But yeah, winamp 5 is fine.

                Comment


                • #9
                  I got 5.02 cuz spybreak told me to, and it was good. So spybreak = good ^___^
                  ♪♫♪♫♪♫♪♫♪♫♪♫
                  Failure teaches success.
                  .
                  

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    I just upgraded from Winamp 2 to Winamp 5 about a week or two ago.
                    I have to say, I'm quite happy with it. It does take a bit longer to start
                    up, but I'm not entirely sure that it's being more demanding as much as
                    just .. being that way. Anyway there is an entire wealth of graphics and
                    usage options that you can enable/disable to have it use a lower system
                    profile, but it still wants a PIII 500mhz min. If you got that, I would hafta
                    say absolutely get it. The modern skin minimized to an always on top
                    toolbar with big friendly control buttons is nice.

                    -Sarien
                    "Sexy" Steve Mijalis-Gilster, IVX

                    Reinstate Me.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      I use both 2 and 5
                      2 when I play in full screen. Less cpu usage and good with one playlist full with all songs I have with shuffle turned on
                      5 when I want to listen to a full album. The bigger you library of songs is the better this one is. Good search function and well organized according to artist -> album -> song. I wouldn't recommend this one for badly organised or tagged files cus it might get messy (ie if one ID tag says Roller Girl and the other Rollergirl it will interpret it as two different artists). It's really good for well organized full albums.
                      5: Da1andonly> !ban epinephrine
                      5: RoboHelp> Are you nuts? You can't ban a staff member!
                      5: Da1andonly> =((
                      5: Epinephrine> !ban da1andonly
                      5: RoboHelp> Staffer "da1andonly" has been banned for abuse.
                      5: Epinephrine> oh shit

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        My Winamp 5 is elite.

                        Comment

                        Working...
                        X