Depsite of all my trash about toked, this is something different and I would like an explanation about this.
*yes I have used that emailadress of ban complaints already*
I got banned for wearing the squadname TOKED=NAZI. Despite of the fact that the two warnings came within like half a minute and I was typing a line to that person who warned me about explaining the stuff to him and got already banned without finishing that line (lol), the following this is quite an abuse of authority :
I got banned for wearing a racist squadname : well calling someone a nazi is not racist. So I filed a complaint using the emailadress given, claiming that that squad I was using wasnt a racist squadname at all. So I get an email back of Overstrand that I got banned for 'staff harrasment', and that the racism part has been dealt with.
Now it gets cloudy here.
So if a non staffer has a fight with a staffer about a non-staff related subject, namely the fact that the staffer wont give back the squad like he promised to and breaks his word. Me, the non staffer, gets pissed and decides to trash him gets banned for it. If thats the case that means that staffers have the freedom to trash people and non staffers dont ? This makes no sense. So staffers got special privileges ? Toked has been an ass to me in private and I have heard things that he did it to other people too (being an ass), so if someone wont accept that and decides to make an anti squad about him he gets banned for it, namely 'staff harrasment'.
Can I get some feedback here ?
If this is the case than it would be quite sad. This means that you can get everyone banned. If someone disagrees with his ban and gets pissed you can put him under the header: staff harrasment and ban him, since staff harrasment is quite a large range to ban people for. Its like one of Stalin's methods to wipe out the non-communist ideas/people.
*yes I have used that emailadress of ban complaints already*
I got banned for wearing the squadname TOKED=NAZI. Despite of the fact that the two warnings came within like half a minute and I was typing a line to that person who warned me about explaining the stuff to him and got already banned without finishing that line (lol), the following this is quite an abuse of authority :
I got banned for wearing a racist squadname : well calling someone a nazi is not racist. So I filed a complaint using the emailadress given, claiming that that squad I was using wasnt a racist squadname at all. So I get an email back of Overstrand that I got banned for 'staff harrasment', and that the racism part has been dealt with.
Now it gets cloudy here.
So if a non staffer has a fight with a staffer about a non-staff related subject, namely the fact that the staffer wont give back the squad like he promised to and breaks his word. Me, the non staffer, gets pissed and decides to trash him gets banned for it. If thats the case that means that staffers have the freedom to trash people and non staffers dont ? This makes no sense. So staffers got special privileges ? Toked has been an ass to me in private and I have heard things that he did it to other people too (being an ass), so if someone wont accept that and decides to make an anti squad about him he gets banned for it, namely 'staff harrasment'.
Can I get some feedback here ?
If this is the case than it would be quite sad. This means that you can get everyone banned. If someone disagrees with his ban and gets pissed you can put him under the header: staff harrasment and ban him, since staff harrasment is quite a large range to ban people for. Its like one of Stalin's methods to wipe out the non-communist ideas/people.
Comment