Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Graveyard of locked abuse threads
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
-
wut~??? cvhe e eechug it wut! urub it wut!!!???? POhtr r rHs s sssssss No fakin da
Leave a comment:
-
PO is staff? If he should be silencing anyone it should be himself, one of the biggest trolls in my experience.
Leave a comment:
-
Done with this game because of the staff abuse. Don't forget kids, no fakkin da pigeons, da emus, no tarrtttles, no fakkin dem!!!!!!!!! H 55 5 5 55 Ch3 3 3 3 3 3 3!!!!! Das Nasti!!!!!!! Cya maybe in 10 years if they fire all the marxist/Bolshevicks, I can get my kicks elsewhere without so much retardation. Qan, you were cool. Hook, LF, Pureownage, good news you helped destroy the last loyal players of the game, Save your salt "we dont ened you" I know, I dont need you either. It was fun until you made "pure purb", ran off 50%% + of the LT players, forced everyone to play a neutered verison of base in Pub (casual play), then ran the rest of us off with your staff. I'm not uninstalling may chat in other zones but will wireshark this for backdoor root and gay spame monitoring wich I suspect this is about, or maybe this game is used for bot-net usage. Goodbye H5 5 5 5 5 5 Ch3 3 3 3 3 Rub it!!! chug it!!!!! at a medium pace!
Leave a comment:
-
Cat,
1. This is not the TrenchWars Support Portal. I don't know why it is that people who cause trouble want to bring their trouble front and center for everyone to see. Future posts made here and not in the support portal will be immediately closed.
2. I am modifying your ban. You had qualified for this ban under the spam rule, where there were things you were posting which were not being interacted with. (e.g. your "wrong chat" messages that you're pretty famous for). Please use this modification as a chance to show you can tone down the spam and have meaningful conversation with players in the community and not just be a constant source of spam.
No one on my staff of moderators wishes for you to be banned. It's actually annoying to issue bans. However, spam will not be tolerated. A reminder of the recent spam rules is here.
Closing.
Leave a comment:
-
i think 4 of the 9 supreme court justices were nominated by presidents who lost the popular vote: Barrett (Trump), Kavanaugh (Trump), Gorsuch (Trump), and Roberts (Bush).Originally posted by Vehicle View PostIt is interesting, though, that the SCOTUS justices voting to overturn Roe were chosen by non-popularly elected presidents
Alito (Bush) was nominated in Bush's second term, where he won the popular vote -- although one could argue the huge incumbency advantage derived from being president while losing the vote count makes it 5 of 9.
the senate is even more undemocratic than the presidential election:Originally posted by Vehicleconfirmed by Senators representing a minority of the country.
"40 million people who live in the 22 smallest states get 44 senators to represent their views and interests. The 40 million people in California get two. Or consider that the majority of Americans (51%) now live in the nine largest states – and yet they get a mere 18% of the seats in the Senate."
This inequity persists with Constitutional Amendments, where 38 of 50 states are required. Factor in gerrymandering, a filibuster that isn't in the constitution (and the founding fathers "contemporaneous writings suggest views that ranged from ambivalent to negative about the value of delaying tactics in general"), and lobbyists, and it's hard to think of an advanced country with a worse democratic framwork.
Leave a comment:
-
With chewed up pepperoni nipsOriginally posted by Zeebu View Postthis thread is a ball of tits
and cheese on the taco
Leave a comment:
Channels
Collapse

Leave a comment: