Now, I'm not looking to get in the middle of this, I just have a situation that involves a simple question.
Izor asked me to put this up.
http://home.comcast.net/~thomas.quick/screenshot55.bmp
Chao <ZH>> I'm doing what i'm able
Izor> i was wearing the squad tag Ku Klux sKuad in a priv arena
Izor> and they hunted me down for it
Izor> meanwhile theres an ER in the arena here and im spamming ?help ?cheater
Izor> and they had robohelp warn me
Izor> for abusing ?help
I think PL took care of it. I just don't see why it required him. Seems like an easy decision to me.
Pure_Luck> hungery, dont come back with that shit name again
My understanding is, policy is not openly specified so people are unable to find loopholes to abuse, which makes sense.
My question is not about the policy, but rather, are staffers informed on the policy? If not, that'd make sense as to why Pure_Luck was needed.
Izor asked me to put this up.
http://home.comcast.net/~thomas.quick/screenshot55.bmp
Chao <ZH>> I'm doing what i'm able
Izor> i was wearing the squad tag Ku Klux sKuad in a priv arena
Izor> and they hunted me down for it
Izor> meanwhile theres an ER in the arena here and im spamming ?help ?cheater
Izor> and they had robohelp warn me
Izor> for abusing ?help
I think PL took care of it. I just don't see why it required him. Seems like an easy decision to me.
Pure_Luck> hungery, dont come back with that shit name again
My understanding is, policy is not openly specified so people are unable to find loopholes to abuse, which makes sense.
My question is not about the policy, but rather, are staffers informed on the policy? If not, that'd make sense as to why Pure_Luck was needed.
Comment