Tweet
I disagree with the closing of very old threads which have been resurrected by a recent post.
-
I'd rather be SubSpacing. -
If one person does it, everyone does it. We don't need he revival of mad-old threads all the time. End of story.
I SAID GOOD DAY, SIR.
(closed)1: Pasta <ER>> lol we are gona win this bd talking about porn on our squadchat
1:EpicLi <ZH>> but should i trust you, you are mean to the ppl
1:trashed> wha
1:EpicLi <ZH>> you will hack into my computer and steal my child porn
1:trashed> i am a very nice person actually.
1:trashed> i do not steal other's child porn
1:trashed> i download my own
sigpic
1:turmio> i was fucking certain that the first time she would touch me i would come -
Posting in your closed thread here stark because I want to quote the rule regarding Necro'd Threads, so I apoligize, but I wanted to address this....
14. Do not revive a perceived 'dead thread' without adding a worthwhile contribution to the thread. Both the variables in this rule are down to the individual mod's discretion.
I do not give a hoot if you revive an old thread as long as you make it relevant to something currently going on in the game and aren't just reviving it because you want to bump something you did in high school to the "What's New" tab. Also, I will stand behind my mods on that part of "individual mod's discretion" because they have all been fair in that aspect from what I've seen, even with players they don't get along with.
If your only contribution is going to be necroing, that is completely useless to the forum.Fuck it.Comment
Comment