Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Some News and Plans

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Crescent Seal
    replied
    Originally posted by Demonic View Post
    Do you ever actually think things through?? get off your anti staff agenda crap cres because im getting a little sick of it to be honest. (wait for the, you gonna ban me comment) Its called ZONE rules not player rules, don't like it? find a zone that will let you set the rules you want cres, and see how many you find. I can see it now, players vote to allow twister to be used again, players vote to allow racism so prittk removes tw from the server, players vote to not block cheaters so have the population quits. Yea brilliant. Sigh bring back kthx, at least he has knowledge of staff so he understands the reasons for things, even if he doesn't necessarily agree with all the decisions behind it, and can speak with some form of experience. You were offered a position in staff, to see about having an input in making changes, and you turned it down. Clearly all mouth.
    you should definitely use that rule first on me...sick of you idiots tbh, who sets zone rules? its still a bunch of fgts who got bullied for not doing their jobs right?

    as far as the offer you made I'll tell you again how i feel about that. When I was actually active and wanting to be on staff I was denied and told to cut back on the racism warnings which I did for a good 6 months. I was denied again after being told to do that. Then I realized how corrupt and incompetent you fgts are so gave up on the idea. Now years later when I barely log on you offer this to me? I don't accept jobs that I would half-ass so why wouldn't I turn it down? You are mistaking me for the 99 percent of the people you have hired already.

    Leave a comment:


  • Demonic
    replied
    Originally posted by Crescent Seal View Post
    things need to change then because its the players who have to follow those rules...not one fgt who can set it for his own benefit
    Do you ever actually think things through?? get off your anti staff agenda crap cres because im getting a little sick of it to be honest. (wait for the, you gonna ban me comment) Its called ZONE rules not player rules, don't like it? find a zone that will let you set the rules you want cres, and see how many you find. I can see it now, players vote to allow twister to be used again, players vote to allow racism so prittk removes tw from the server, players vote to not block cheaters so have the population quits. Yea brilliant. Sigh bring back kthx, at least he has knowledge of staff so he understands the reasons for things, even if he doesn't necessarily agree with all the decisions behind it, and can speak with some form of experience. You were offered a position in staff, to see about having an input in making changes, and you turned it down. Clearly all mouth.

    Leave a comment:


  • Crescent Seal
    replied
    Originally posted by Demonic View Post
    Because rule changes are set by the zone (bang op) not the players, its always been the case and always will be the case.
    things need to change then because its the players who have to follow those rules...not one fgt who can set it for his own benefit

    Leave a comment:


  • Demonic
    replied
    Originally posted by Crescent Seal View Post
    not sure why we can't vote on rule changes
    Because rule changes are set by the zone (bang op) not the players, its always been the case and always will be the case.

    Leave a comment:


  • Crescent Seal
    replied
    not sure why we can't vote on rule changes

    Leave a comment:


  • Shaddowknight
    replied
    Originally posted by Demonic View Post
    Hmm well what about dramatically decreasing terr speed when lev is attached, at least would make it require more skill for the terr? I don't lt so you guys have to tell me
    well, we're akready working on things with fiS, so when we get voting polls in pub ready everyone will have a chance to put their ideas in it to be voted upon

    Leave a comment:


  • mtine
    replied
    That could work. Or, as someone suggested in another thread, give every ship the option to anti the LT, or at least the warbird.

    Leave a comment:


  • Demonic
    replied
    Originally posted by Shaddowknight View Post
    Dont remove normal roofers from having fun too. The current base is already pretty bad for roofers, so kicking them in the nuts again wouldnt be very great.
    Hmm well what about dramatically decreasing terr speed when lev is attached, at least would make it require more skill for the terr? I don't lt so you guys have to tell me

    Leave a comment:


  • Shaddowknight
    replied
    Originally posted by Demonic View Post
    With LT what if flag room was protected from lev bombs(think insulated walls) but all other areas of base was available. Would that be a potential compromise for both parties??
    Dont remove normal roofers from having fun too. The current base is already pretty bad for roofers, so kicking them in the nuts again wouldnt be very great.

    Leave a comment:


  • mtine
    replied
    LOL I'm screwed. Hehe.
    On another note I made in another thread: why not disable LTs or just levis during killothon? Ez pz.

    Leave a comment:


  • Demonic
    replied
    Originally posted by mtine View Post
    LOL Demo. So if I call u or any other Staff member an idiot I'm gone? GG Steam users.
    No just me

    Leave a comment:


  • Demonic
    replied
    Originally posted by Oranje View Post
    #1 Screenshots are fakable

    #2 What if demonic quits and a fgt takes over?

    #3 What some others already said (more or less); when is something considered harassment?

    #4 Is staff better than players are?; Why would u make this rule for staff and not for players?
    #1 - screenshots are good, but there are things only I can check to see if details are true or not

    #2 - I guess that's a compliment? I can't be here forever, and currently oO.Oo (4o) would be my natural replacement for bang although also now training up reck.

    #3 - impossible to list all examples as its situational, but use your common sense.

    #4 - Harrasment of players is an ssc rule and a net bankable offence in some circumstances. Also staff can't ignore players in case they need a cheater call or help call sorting etc.

    Leave a comment:


  • Demonic
    replied
    With LT what if flag room was protected from lev bombs(think insulated walls) but all other areas of base was available. Would that be a potential compromise for both parties??

    Leave a comment:


  • Demonic
    replied
    Originally posted by Dral View Post
    y? wat this used for?



    Why not use this?
    [ATTACH]1059[/ATTACH]
    If you don't want it to give out pubbux like it used to, that's easily fixed.


    Remove all the league junk, new players don't need it and everyone else already knows it.




    Turning it so it only pops up once upon entering the zone would've been faster than actually typing that. I didn't know transparency was an option though, unless you mean only in black "dead" areas.



    All in all I think this is a positive thing. It opens the possibility of putting the King of the Hill side-game into use and rewarding it with "pointbux" with no programming at all. There could be a small periodic reward to the team holding the flag (much like how they're awarded 200 points periodically now). The point values of each ship, previously determined by the bot, could easily be changed through the InitialBounty setting in the server.cfg. Terrier's, maybe sharks too but can't remember, would slowly increase in "pointbux" value due to their high PrizeShareLimit (same with levi's, but that'd be due to their kills increasing bounty). Some prizes could be purchased without a need to PM the bot through ?buy (antiwarp, bursts, reps). Some negatives though, don't think you can restrict how fast purchases can be done, so sharks and levi's could chain purchase reps and terriers could chain purchase bursts. This might be avoidable, not sure what the PrizeDelay setting does. Than again, worst case, they could be bought through pubsystem like they are now and it would still reduce the strain on the bot system tremendously due to not having to add pubbux every time anything happens.


    If the game needs to be balanced, it needs to be balanced. I'm fairly indifferent to levi's. If the only concern is levterring during low population times, just put a limit in where if the players in pub is less than X, levs are disabled. I do think that levs will hurt the repopulation effort, when a new player gets blasted and has no idea where it even came from he'll just think the entire game is riddled with bugs and quit.


    I don't really like this myself, but I suppose it's good to cover all the bases. Could very easily be abused and I'm not 100% sure I'd trust all of the current smods to be the judge, jury, and executioner. I assume Demo will be reviewing all cases including the ones where she didn't make the decision herself, yes?

    btw fiS, your spelling is horrid! dun ban me


    edited to fix grammatical errors D:
    Yes dral I will always be available to review decisions, if someone is unhappy with a ban on it they can appeal to reckful, if still unhappy can take it to me. To put this into context , for the last 3/4 yrs I have solely held responsibility for this and have banned 1 player for harassment. When they cooled off they apologised and ban was lifted, so in theory half a ban in 3 years. I doubt it will be used but as I'm allowing smods to use it, I figured its important you knew it's existence. That saying there is issues with 24 atm which may change my record, but that's another story.
    Wark not sure why you are concerned, you can be a pain in the rear end at times but your arguments are normally well constructed and thought out, so don't see why you should be worried, unless your just like that with me and not other staffers. That said if I hear one more bloody meow I think I am going to shoot something, but that's for another place/discussion.

    Leave a comment:


  • mtine
    replied
    Reinstate Dral ASAP or replace him with my dog.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X