Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Stricter Rules

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Stricter Rules

    For all the rules that we're having problems with; we should have them be stricter!

    Or atleast setup a disclaimer for things like the levi in pub that everyone keeps arguing about:

    By flying a leviathan (ship#4) and/or levi-terr, you acknowledge that TrenchWars (further now as TW) own all the points you received while in the leviathan and all the points you get from that point until the end of time, rights to the entire contents of your messages and context sent with your messages in your chats, your squad, your name, your computer, your house, your car, your first born and your soul. Furthermore, You accept TW views and opinions as being right over your views and opinions regardless of anything. Furthermore, you agree that it is okay for TW (or in this case, TW STAFF and PUBLIC) or anyone else to slander you openly in person, in subspace, in any other game, in email, instant message, on telephone, or anywhere else in this or any other universe and/or dimension. Know that embarking into a leviathan or assisting a leviathan as a levi-terr or etc. is a request for character defamation, endless belittling and excessive mockery from TW (also in this case, TW PUBLIC and STAFF). This disclaimer is subject to change without notice, and you are still subject to the rules regardless of any changes made. If you do not agree with these rules, don't get in that leviathan or help one out.
    inspiration [maddox]


    This can apply for other rules that have to do with leagues. Just replace LEVI with whatever applies. Maybe squad hoppers or something.
    Last edited by MaGi kOz; 06-17-2003, 12:35 PM.

  • #2
    LT's own you and your cheesy lil basing only stuff, come hunt us down or better yet play a game that has some sort of Nerf equipment, that should make it soft enough for chidren!



    Levi/LT brother *hood forever! (we love haters makes those 5-fers more juicy)
    sigpic

    Comment


    • #3
      Yes... YES! THAT'S WHAT WE ALL NEED! WE NEED THE RULES TO BE STRICTER.

      -Qbe
      Trench Wars Player
      questionedone@hotmail.com
      STFU GG -NT-.

      Comment


      • #4
        MUUUUUUAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAH-

        Originally posted by bounty*killer
        LT's own you and your cheesy lil basing only stuff, come hunt us down or better yet play a game that has some sort of Nerf equipment, that should make it soft enough for chidren!



        Levi/LT brother *hood forever! (we love haters makes those 5-fers more juicy)

        shut up fag. i'm right you're wrong... read the rules in my signature. geesh you retard.

        [continued from subject] -AHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA.................. MUAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAH!

        Comment


        • #5
          if you made it so that teamkilling destroyed your rec, maybe people woudln't lev so much.
          http://www.trenchwars.org/forums/showthread.php?t=15100 - Gallileo's racist thread

          "Mustafa sounds like someone that likes to fly planes into buildings." -Galleleo

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: MUUUUUUAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAH-

            Originally posted by MaGi kOz
            shut up fag. i'm right you're wrong... read the rules in my signature. geesh you retard.

            [continued from subject] -AHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA.................. MUAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAH!
            Your sig sucks, so it doesn't count.
            "No pizza! Only khlav kalash!"
            "Alright, gimme a bowl."
            "Not bowl! Stick! Stick!"
            "Now give me something to wash that awful taste out of my mouth with."
            "Mountain Dew or crabjuice."
            "Ewwww!!! I'll have a crabjuice."

            Comment


            • #7
              MIRROR DAMAGE FOR TK'ING!!!


              i honestly think this should be implemented if possible

              Comment


              • #8
                To Magi Koz - Best Sig Ever.
                DELETED

                Comment


                • #9
                  Re: Re: MUUUUUUAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAH-

                  Originally posted by Khlav Kalash
                  Your sig sucks, so it doesn't count.


                  NOBODY ASKED FOR YOUR OPINION THEREFOR YOUR REPLY IS VOID. THANK YOU BUT DONT COME AGAIN, ASSHOLE.

                  P.S.
                  STICK TO THE TOPIC PLEASE.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Re: Re: Re: MUUUUUUAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAH-

                    Originally posted by MaGi kOz
                    Disclaimer:
                    By replying to my posts, you acknowledge that I own all the rights to the entire contents of your message, and images sent with the message, your squad, your name, your computer, your house, your car, your first born and your soul. Furthermore, You accept my views and opinions as being right regardless of anything. Furthermore, you agree that it is okay for me or anyone else to slander you openly on this forum, in person, in email, instant message, or anywhere else in this or any other universe and/or dimension. Know that replying to my posts is a request for character defamation, endless belittling and excessive mockery. This disclaimer is subject to change without notice, and you are still subject to the rules regardless of any changes made. If you do not agree with these rules, then don't reply to my posts.
                    I don't have a squad, this is a library computer, I live in a apartment, can't afford a car, I am sterile, and I already sold my soul. Well then, I will just go forward in time where you can't slander me. I do not agree to your rules, I will rebel fuckwad. I laugh at your puny slandering, character defamation, endless/boring belittling, and excessively gay mockery.
                    dong burger

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Note that the natural general principle that will subsume this case is necessary to impose an interpretation on the traditional practice of grammarians. We have already seen that the earlier discussion of deviance is not subject to a descriptive fact. To characterize a linguistic level L, a subset of English sentences interesting on quite independent grounds raises serious doubts about a stipulation to place the constructions into these various categories. Notice, incidentally, that this analysis of a formative as a pair of sets of features is to be regarded as an important distinction in language use. Furthermore, any associated supporting element can be defined in such a way as to impose the ultimate standard that determines the accuracy of any proposed grammar.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Re: Re: Re: MUUUUUUAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAH-

                        ^^

                        What he said.
                        "No pizza! Only khlav kalash!"
                        "Alright, gimme a bowl."
                        "Not bowl! Stick! Stick!"
                        "Now give me something to wash that awful taste out of my mouth with."
                        "Mountain Dew or crabjuice."
                        "Ewwww!!! I'll have a crabjuice."

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          new stats box

                          W L R AVE TKS
                          There once was a man from Nantucket.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Re: Re: Re: Re: MUUUUUUAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAH-

                            Originally posted by Darius Winds
                            I don't have a squad, this is a library computer, I live in a apartment, can't afford a car, I am sterile, and I already sold my soul. Well then, I will just go forward in time where you can't slander me. I do not agree to your rules, I will rebel fuckwad. I laugh at your puny slandering, character defamation, endless/boring belittling, and excessively gay mockery.

                            Looks like I don't have to do anything but hang my head down in shame. AND CAN WE PLEASE STICK TO THE TOPIC AT HAND?

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by Malladrin
                              Note that the natural general principle that will subsume this case is necessary to impose an interpretation on the traditional practice of grammarians. We have already seen that the earlier discussion of deviance is not subject to a descriptive fact. To characterize a linguistic level L, a subset of English sentences interesting on quite independent grounds raises serious doubts about a stipulation to place the constructions into these various categories. Notice, incidentally, that this analysis of a formative as a pair of sets of features is to be regarded as an important distinction in language use. Furthermore, any associated supporting element can be defined in such a way as to impose the ultimate standard that determines the accuracy of any proposed grammar.
                              [sarcasm] I am a master of the english language. How about everyone else? [/sarcasm]

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X