Thoughts about improving x

[Spiderex]

I have an idea of how to improve x. I think the x should be normal sized, without any reps or rockets, with L1 bullets and a capability of carying 1 turret.
So, imagine you are the new x, and entering a flagroom without a terr (i see that a lot lately) or a terr thats dumb enough not to turn his/her radar on. Once inside, you message ur teammates that you're in and let the fun begin.

[Cylor]

Usually when people hope to "change" things in the zone, they spend time thinking about their change and what it will effect and they spend time backing up why they think this change should happen.

In the whole 3 minutes it took you to post that, I'm sure you didn't spend time thinking about it, nor did you try to back-up why you think this should happen.

You also have now credibility as to why we should listen to your posts seeing as how you haven't posted a relevant thing in the week you have spent spamming these forums.

Also, call the ship by it's name. It's a weasel, not an "x". "X" is a term used to describe cloaking, not an entire ship.

[Troll King]

There was a brief period years ago when they made cloakers attachable. It wasn't received very well. I think people preferred the time they let Lancs have a single turret, but ultimately those two experiments didn't stick.

Who knows, maybe times have changed.

[poop juice]

giving the weasel a turret could be a good idea. it would create new strategies and give basing an element of surprise, and finally make the weasel a useful ship.

Originally posted by CyloR
Usually when people hope to "change" things in the zone, they spend time thinking about their change and what it will effect and they spend time backing up why they think this change should happen.

In the whole 3 minutes it took you to post that, I'm sure you didn't spend time thinking about it, nor did you try to back-up why you think this should happen.

You also have now credibility as to why we should listen to your posts seeing as how you haven't posted a relevant thing in the week you have spent spamming these forums.

Also, call the ship by it's name. It's a weasel, not an "x". "X" is a term used to describe cloaking, not an entire ship.

nice to have some constructive feedback for this topic
and spiderex hasn't been here a full week yet

[NastyRabbit]

DAMN, why did i have to post right after Poop Juice. Now everyone will skip mine. Just kidding Poop.


I do not believe having two ships that are capable of turret is a good idea. The reasons the Terrier makes a good turret ship is:
1) Speed and Maneuverability
2) Ability to set a Portal
3) The color and fancy pin stripes

O.K. Two out of three isn't too bad.

The Weasel is too slow; how would you address the issue of cloaked vs. non cloaked ships? Maybe you could take away multi from the weasel and give it (1) Mine.

[Nickname]

There is no ship called the x.


The ship you refer to is the Weasel. Please get it right.

[Spiderex]

noone cares about ur stupid flames...

On to the topic:
Yes, terr has the speed and shit, but the weasel has cloak and stealth. It's a spy. It would go into the flagroom (hopefully unnoticed) and then the turrets could wipe out the fr from inside. Besides, i'm sick of getting lamed by an x, it needs changes, period.

[Savageee]

it would create new strategies and give basing an element of surprise, and finally make the weasel a useful ship.

The weasel can do many useful things, it can rocket a terrier after going in one of the small holes or it can remove levi's from inside the base.

Besides, i'm sick of getting lamed by an x, it needs changes, period.

His true motive for posting this thread is revealed.

[Noah]

Can some super-forum-moderator-acid-tank-class please merge all these threads and call it "Lame Weasel Ideas"?

I'm so tired of reading the same over and over again

[Kolar]

Originally posted by Spiderex
Besides, i'm sick of getting lamed by an x, it needs changes, period.

Having atleast 700 people ask and whine about having the cloakable ship removed or changed hasn't done anything what do you expect to get out of this thread?


We are not flamming you (mostly). We are trying to make you understand that you and some others, it's not completely about you, are spamming the forum (meaning posting useless crap we don't like to see intentionally and have admitted to it already). You have left your self open to flamming anyways. Just because the forum has a useless crap section and mods who do their jobs well does not give you or anyone the right to ruin this forum for Trench Wars.

Consider what you post, if you're not looking to get flammed. I don't expect and you shouldn't expect that to ever change. When you do stuff like this you lose all credibility then we just ignore you or flame your post even if it has some validity or not.

[poop juice]

Originally posted by Spiderex
You people are like animals! Have some heart fuckers!

[Troll King]

They get flammed for posting spam and they get flammed for posting things that aren't spam. Come on people, throw them a bone here.

[za gophar]

my idea for changing the X AKA THE CLOAKER:

1. Get rid of the cloak cause its lame and annoying and newbies abuse it.

2. Keep Stealth

3. Make it half spider half warbird.

This would be unique because it would often take away radar shooting capabilities from its enemy, and would make it sneaky, but not far too sneaky, like it is now. Hell, keep it one tile also. So what I am thinking is a two or three shot kill. (almost always takes 4 in spider at full energy)

This would also mean that lancs would have to have lvl 3 bullets in order to weaken the lvl 2's. I would recommend that it would be tested in an arena before full scale release, im sure there would be plenty of people glad to test it with a zone message like "new weasel testing session beginning in ?go newweasel."
***********

If that change sounds to big too you (might even sound too big to me) then i think the best solution would be to modify the cloaker in that it gives its enemy a chance to respond before it kills him.

[Savageee]

They get flammed for posting spam and they get flammed for posting things that aren't spam. Come on people, throw them a bone here.

Look at the post just before yours, how can that not be considered spam? I thought poop wrote some thread about how he was sorry and wouldn't post useless shit all the time. How is quoting someone that has nothing to do with the topic without even saying anything eles not spam? He deserves every flame he gets and it's his fault even if he does post one or two things that aren't spam.

[Mandagorian]

Thoughts about improving x

GTFO