Average Enemy Rating Per Player

[not in game]

I was wondering if you could implement an AVER for each player. Because there is a difference between a 17-10 vs Deathcaps and 17-10 vs Quake. (not saying i scored those; those were just random numbers)

It's not really necessary, but it'd be cool to know which guys play the hardest opponents and do well. It would require another variable, but i was thinking playing 7-800 games or so (max games that i remember between resets) against high average of like, 1300 nme rating, and it's still not over the JAVA int or short limit.

well, i think so. unless everyone's against it...

[Mr. 420]

I'm sometimes a stat-whore so I'd be all for this. Sounds like a good way to put a number to your skill level :P

[Izor]

I was wondering if you could implement an AVER for each player. Because there is a difference between a 17-10 vs Deathcaps and 17-10 vs Quake. (not saying i scored those; those were just random numbers)

If this were the case, I'd say deathcaps is harder than Quakes lineup of kicker/nokkonen/turban/zhou, cause they dont even wb. Youd have to do individual rating not vs squad.

[Reaver]

Thats true but you could also make the point that a squad is only as strong as its weakest link and therefore the points earned for beating their lineup with a weak player or two in are justified

Individual rating wouldn't be bad though

[Creature]

This is just going to produce more rec-whoring n00bs who hide all game to get good recs.

[pascone]

This is just going to produce more rec-whoring n00bs who hide all game to get good recs.

like u excpet u fail to get the good rec

[not in game]

If this were the case, I'd say deathcaps is harder than Quakes lineup of kicker/nokkonen/turban/zhou, cause they dont even wb. Youd have to do individual rating not vs squad.

I think that adding an individual rating, would be difficult and impractical, due to the size of that addition. If it helps, think of this as a baby step toward your final goal. Can't just jump to the answer, got to work your way up.
Another thing, everyone knows that a squad's AVER has a large deviation due to the squad variability of the player lines. I think people would understand that too amongst each player's AVER. Lastly, people know that AVER is also dependent on when the squads enter the TWD ladder.

As for rec-whoring noobs, I'm not asking for any change of calculating statistics. A player's 9-9 will stay a 9-9. I don't see how a player's AVER will make him rec-whore more or less.

One of the things I just noticed is that the easier squads might not get as many twd games, because players would start caring about their own AVER. But, I think that happens a lot even now (better players not wanting to twd easier squads)

[Exalt]

One of the things I just noticed is that the easier squads might not get as many twd games, because players would start caring about their own AVER. But, I think that happens a lot even now (better players not wanting to twd easier squads)

I'll agree with this. Top squads do not want to play deathcaps... ever. Not unless someone wants to 1v4 them for kicks... that's the only way you will ever see it.

[Creature]

like u excpet u fail to get the good rec

fuk off pascone!

[PjOtTeR]

In other words, you want a value/rating system implemented like we used to have in TWLM when Anzu ran that shit...

And yes, That would be awesome!!!!