Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Reduce roster sizes

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    And spastic didnt die to inactivity

    We had enough players but were either not wanting to play, or if we did play we sucked ass and lost a lot of games.

    It went downhill when assistants and caps were leaving for other squads.
    sigpic
    All good things must come to an end.

    Comment


    • #17
      Dont limit TWD rosters, that would be stupid. Some people wants to log on once in a while and play some twd, no reason to axe them because it benefits noone. Inactive players dont form sqds.

      Reducing TWL roster size, well I guess Im against it but I understand if some people wants to do it. That could be worth trying, propably would be a failure tho.

      Comment


      • #18
        Originally posted by freddie View Post
        Dont limit TWD rosters, that would be stupid. Some people wants to log on once in a while and play some twd, no reason to axe them because it benefits noone. Inactive players dont form sqds.
        I agree.

        Comment


        • #19
          3 league squads need 35 players OR MORE. 1 league squads should be the only ones with 25 player limit.....

          40 player TWD limit would be cool.

          Comment


          • #20
            5 + 5 + 8 = 18

            Add an entire line of subs for all leagues and you have 36. You shouldn't need more than that, with these numbers nobody is even playing in more than one league.

            I too think that we should make an effort to create more squads, atleast for TWBD/TWLB. Squads like Respect has way more basers than what they would need for their TWL line, but with so many good basers on the side they've recruited much of the competition.
            Da1andonly> man this youghurt only made me angry

            5:ph> n0ah will dangle from a helicopter ladder and just reduce the landscape to ashes by sweeping his beard across it

            Comment


            • #21
              You only need 5 players minimum for subs

              No one subs their entire team out

              in DD/JD you don't get more than 1 or 2 subs.

              I don't remember the last the time where everyone on a basing squad was subbed out of their bd because of lag/sucking (?go base does not count)

              and when do you play one league match and another at the same time?

              I don't think TWL would allow that. Only squads who do that has more than enough players (like those squads with 60 PPL ON THEIR FUCKING ROSTER) for twd.

              If you're not willing to accept a limit to roster sizes, at least accept that having that many ppl on certain squads is ridiculous and needs to be changed.
              sigpic
              All good things must come to an end.

              Comment


              • #22
                I think we spoke about it like 3 years ago...
                people complain that out of 50 people in a roster, half are inactive. half of those who are active, are lagging, and half of those who are not lagging, are just there for the friendship and chats.

                I thought it was a good idea few years ago, and I think it will be good idea today. It will just force players who are considered second line, to play first line, and add more for the competition.
                There was also idea of making two leagues, like premier and secondary, with teams that promote and demote each end of a season. It could be even more interesting...

                Comment


                • #23
                  i think cutting down roster sizes for twl would be a good idea but if there isn't a twd limit it won't do that much. like kthx said, a lot of people will just sit on roster to claim they have a title. so i think what we need is to reduce twd roster limit to say 40 or 45, and make twl limit smaller, probably 30. that way there will be a big number of players who have to find new twd squads or be squadless. +competition for twl will be a little better
                  Gun remembers.

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Well there are plenty of squads with 30+ players who all know that there are going to be maybe 5-6 people playing in every single twld game and don't care about it, There are two kinds of people in TW, Leaders and Lackeys, there are far more Lackeys than Leaders, it DOES take something different to be a cap of a squad instead of a leader or else the squad dies or fails miserably.
                    Rabble Rabble Rabble

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Roster limit for TWL would be good idea. Roster limit for TWD may not work so well. Players seem to be less active these days so some squads need 30-40 players if they want to qualify for three leagues. Also new players get opportunity to play on those huge squads with 50-70 members hah.

                      As long as squadhopping/aliasing is accepted by majority of TW caps/TW Staff Trench Wars squads will lack a strong sense of idenity and continue to die out quickly. Players bounce around from squad to squad. That has always been the case, but it seems way more frequent then in the past.

                      From my own experience the squads I have enjoyed the most are the ones with 15-25 members - most of them dedicated players. Every squad will have inactives though, just the nature of the game.

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Originally posted by freddie View Post
                        Dont limit TWD rosters, that would be stupid. Some people wants to log on once in a while and play some twd, no reason to axe them because it benefits noone. Inactive players dont form sqds.

                        Reducing TWL roster size, well I guess Im against it but I understand if some people wants to do it. That could be worth trying, propably would be a failure tho.
                        If what gran says is true(12 more squads), the inactive players who log on once in a while can easily find another squad?
                        (Steadman)>they went out drinking... ogron siaxis and siaxis gf
                        (Steadman)>apparently ogron is EXTREMELY morbidly obese and ridiculously sweaty
                        (Steadman)>and he spend the entire night being awkward and staring at siaxis gf
                        (Steadman)>and after that they did not meet up again...

                        Iron Survivor> you missed something in your sig. he also smells like cheese

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Originally posted by Draft View Post
                          If what gran says is true(12 more squads), the inactive players who log on once in a while can easily find another squad?
                          If you make the roster limit in TWD 25, then that means each roster spot is important. So if you're trying to run a squad with this limit, you're not going to waste roster spots on inactive players. So instead of logging on every now and then to play some TWD, these inactive players will have no squad and just won't log on at all.

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Originally posted by Burnt View Post
                            If you make the roster limit in TWD 25, then that means each roster spot is important. So if you're trying to run a squad with this limit, you're not going to waste roster spots on inactive players. So instead of logging on every now and then to play some TWD, these inactive players will have no squad and just won't log on at all.
                            Yea I agree with this. And even if some of them found new squad, they propably stay as inactives and got axed later cause small roster cant have that many inactives. IMO you just cant build anything on inactive players.

                            No limit in TWD: Inactive players can stay in roster and play once in a while. No positive or negative effects.

                            Limit in TWD: Inactive players gets axed and stops playing. No positive effects but negative effects with people quitting.

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              re

                              limit it like this

                              1 league squads - 20
                              2 league squads - 25
                              3 league squads - 30

                              For TWL ofcourse, TWD limit should remain limitless B)
                              TWLJ SEASON 12 CHAMPION
                              TWLD SEASON 12 CHAMPION
                              KISS MY RINGS

                              1:Eelam> http://i31.tinypic.com/2vjskt2.jpg
                              1:Eelam> 3:TagMor> meh, i get girls regardless
                              1:Eelam> ROFLMAO

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Originally posted by freddie View Post
                                Limit in TWD: Inactive players gets axed and stops playing. No positive effects but negative effects with people quitting.
                                There's many reasons why a person is inactive

                                but one of them is because they don't get to play. I'm sure if they were axed and had to find a new squad where they can get a chance to start, they will get active again.
                                sigpic
                                All good things must come to an end.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X