Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Any suggestions for TWD in general?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Stabwound
    replied
    I said in the first post that the intention was not to limit anyone from playing TWD.

    We now have the ability to set lag limits for individual ships from 1-8, so while implementing those limits I took the time to tweak the overall lag limits which were different across individual divisions and TWD-> TWL. In some cases TWL was less strict than TWD, which doesn't make sense. At least they're now uniform, although TWL may possibly remain more strict than TWD.

    But yeah, comparing this to changing resolution limits doesn't make any sense. Maybe if we implemented a MINIMUM resolution of 1920x1440 you'd have something to compare it to.

    Leave a comment:


  • Zeebu
    replied
    Originally posted by Crescent Seal View Post
    so a few people cry about the lag limit and its uplifted, but MANY people complain about the resolution and its still in effect....classic, fuk ursilf staff suk dik homos
    theres a bit of a difference between not being able to play at all and having other people at higher resolutions forcing you to adapt. not saying the new reso limits are great or anything. you just have to recognize a difference.

    but otherwise in your post, the few people that complained were the few that were targetted for the most part. the specials being restricted to less laggy players does make sense. now the people actually being the most vocal about the res limits are generally wbs. and theyve mostly been the same few who have just complained very loudly and often. when this is all said and done, i expect the wb resolutions to go back to 1280x1024 with the basing and jav limits staying bigger.

    Leave a comment:


  • Barton
    replied
    Originally posted by Crescent Seal View Post
    so a few people cry about the lag limit and its uplifted, but MANY people complain about the resolution and its still in effect....classic, fuk ursilf staff suk dik homos
    resolution is being worked on..

    Leave a comment:


  • Crescent Seal
    replied
    so a few people cry about the lag limit and its uplifted, but MANY people complain about the resolution and its still in effect....classic, fuk ursilf staff suk dik homos

    Leave a comment:


  • Stabwound
    replied
    Originally posted by Ganon-Knight View Post
    grats on blocking australians from DDing or playing any special ship in BD just because they're australian
    Yes, it was intentional to disallow Australians (or people with dialup, whatever) from playing special ships in BD. I already explained why.

    It wasn't intentional to disallow them from playing TWD altogether, though. Whatever, I guess we have to have 300ms limit again.

    Leave a comment:


  • Guest's Avatar
    Guest replied
    Free Agent

    add a "Free Agent" option on the right side below 'Gallery' that shows what people are squadless/looking for squads?

    Leave a comment:


  • kthx
    replied
    Oh man, a change is making things unfair for people. Im sorry guys but this isn't your 1998 TW anymore, this is 2010 TW now and we just have too much technology these days to allow Australians to play twd. Thats why we have to make tons of changes that let only some people enjoy the zone.

    Leave a comment:


  • Daldur
    replied
    RE: TWD Lag limits

    Hey all,


    I understand if banning aussies from playing TWL-B makes the league more enjoyable, fine.
    But not allowing us to play TWBD by restricting lag limits below 280ms is kind of lame, considering TWBD amounts for nothing in this game.

    Leave a comment:


  • PaulOakenfold
    replied
    The text that goes vertical on the match statistics is a different font. It looks awkward.

    Leave a comment:


  • Ganon-Knight
    replied
    grats on blocking australians from DDing or playing any special ship in BD just because they're australian

    Leave a comment:


  • the_paul
    replied
    Good decision, especially about the lag limits in specials.

    Sorry pene

    Leave a comment:


  • Turban
    replied
    Originally posted by Stabwound View Post
    If 250ms is too low, and I don't think it is, then fine, it can be raised. It would be nice if we could have higher lag limits for overseas players but I don't think that's a feasible idea. This isn't meant to exclude anyone from playing TWD unless they really shouldn't be playing for the sake of others enjoyment of the game. To name names, the main reason for the wb/jav/lanc 150ms limit is because of Brokenfist and Dald (and probably others) who squads intentionally put into these ships because they lag. Now they won't be able to do that anymore, but they're still free to play any of the other ships. Lag is has more of an effect in basing than any other league because of how close together you are to everyone else at all times, and if you're over 150ms it's just too much to be fair to others if you're in a 1-hit-kill ship.

    Also, I am pretty sure that currently most people that lag out in TWD lag out because of triggering spikes, not because of the max ping limit. However, if this does end up making overseas players lag out, I'll raise it higher.
    I'm sure you're aware of this by now, but Australians have around 250ms to 280ms latency (depending where in Australia they live). Hence, the limit is too low at the moment.

    300ms will do the trick to fix that.

    Leave a comment:


  • Black Mage
    replied
    Originally posted by Dwopple View Post
    rework the MVP formula to allow sharks a chance to MVP in BD/LB, if a shark gets 20+ kills 2/3+ TeKs, its 90% of the time a game changing performance. I think a lot of sharks would appreciate it.
    I like this also. Perhaps keep a few more stats for sharks. The more stats kept the better.

    Leave a comment:


  • Burnt
    replied
    I suggest you move my TWLD season 2 medal from the name Static Burn to the name Burnt...it's really not right that it says I have the same amount of titles as newbies like Ease and Fludd.

    Leave a comment:


  • kthx
    replied
    Oh and good decision Stabwound but I was sorta hoping since you doubled the resolution limits that you would cut the lag limits in half.

    But I guess I should be thankful for small concessions.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X