Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Twlb squads number

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Originally posted by Cig Smoke
    There is a hell of alot more basing squads now then there was back then. I can name 16 rite now who would make it a good league.

    1.spastic
    2.diso
    3.pallies
    4.-f-
    5.mambo
    6.a-s
    7.dice
    8.venom
    9.juice
    10. sk8
    11.rb
    12.bc
    13.incuria
    14.melee
    15.ancients
    16.pirates

    Edit: and all 16 of these are squads who are together for a pretty long time and they are pretty stable. Alot of them its there 1st LB but they been in other leagues (like pirates,anc) i think its clear 16 would work.

    Also u dont need to have 1 big group. I think it works fine with conferences.
    BTW, you can remove melee from twlb now, they have no more basers but bosshawk.

    Comment


    • #32
      Originally posted by Sufficient
      I think there were more squads basing prior to TWL6 ... remember Dekai? That was some great TWD competition with Mambo, Spastic, Camisade, and Dekai as the newer teams and Light, Pallies, Onix?, Diso, Elusive, as the older teams.

      I just think there were more squads then than now.
      How do u figure? Most of those squads are still around that u listed above, and the ones that arent are replaced with similar squads. Plus if im not mistaken that season let any squad from the prior season have there TWL spot. So u had squads like paladen, cripples, british squad and al that in there. Thats why ppl wanted it limited bc we had squads like british squad goin 0-10 with huge blowouts and they wrent improving. Now basing is more popular then back then and we clearly have more squads who are competative in basing then back then.
      _o_2NASRALLAH

      Comment


      • #33
        Long season?

        Why is a long season a bad thing?

        I don't understand why people say a long season is a bad thing. The leauge is set up for teams who like to play, and are at a higher level. So why would playing more games at this higher compition level be a bad thing?

        Morons.

        More games > less games.

        I don't care how many teams are in the league, 14 or 16. 16 would prolly be better as

        more games > less games.

        and I agree with Rab that the basing cup style is better. We should have everyone play everybody. Then set up a double elimination playoff bracket where every single squad left in at the end of the league plays.

        More games > Less games.

        Your rec in the regular season determines your ladder spot.

        Obviously staff has issues with a longer season b.c of the time required to host the matches. And same with a longer post season.

        Solution? Bring in more staffers who just host league games. I'd volunteer for that. recruit several people who don't have all th other powers. Personally I don't want to mess with the day to crap of staff. But I'd want to help with leauges b.c that would be fun. (at least it seems like it would)
        :fear:
        I came, I saw, I lagged out... :rolleyes:

        Comment


        • #34
          I said that b4 jacky when we were having host problems and i said each match should have 2 refs instead of 1 or a group of refs for 1 game. I cant remember what the whole conversation was but i think the conclusion was dock wont let us have ppl with powers just for league or something. Again maybe im wrong on taht too but tehre was some reason bc this was braught up b4.

          I dont think 16 teams woul dmake it a longer season anyway. Just keep it how it was last season and make 2 conferences 8 in each and go from there.
          _o_2NASRALLAH

          Comment


          • #35
            Originally posted by Cig Smoke
            Just make it 16 teams, and then bring back conferences! Everyone loves conferences, right?
            You bet!
            Originally posted by Ward
            OK.. ur retarded case closed

            Comment


            • #36
              Originally posted by Lamb
              from what i know, there isnt one truly bad squad except for what is ee on twleagues.org about Melee and sk8. but i hear sk8 is better
              16 teams for my vote
              haha, what
              chino, fizzy, DF, zeimonster, download, ease, anzu, underground, exotic, asmodeus, blah blah blah

              are we really that bad?
              Last edited by GHB; 01-07-2005, 11:17 AM.
              YOU ARE THE 1,000,000,000TH VISITOR IN MY SIG!
              Click here to receive your price!

              Comment


              • #37
                Originally posted by JacKieChan>
                Why is a long season a bad thing?

                I don't understand why people say a long season is a bad thing. The leauge is set up for teams who like to play, and are at a higher level. So why would playing more games at this higher compition level be a bad thing?

                Morons.

                More games > less games.

                I don't care how many teams are in the league, 14 or 16. 16 would prolly be better as

                more games > less games.

                and I agree with Rab that the basing cup style is better. We should have everyone play everybody. Then set up a double elimination playoff bracket where every single squad left in at the end of the league plays.

                More games > Less games.

                Your rec in the regular season determines your ladder spot.

                Obviously staff has issues with a longer season b.c of the time required to host the matches. And same with a longer post season.

                Solution? Bring in more staffers who just host league games. I'd volunteer for that. recruit several people who don't have all th other powers. Personally I don't want to mess with the day to crap of staff. But I'd want to help with leauges b.c that would be fun. (at least it seems like it would)
                :fear:
                I wouldnt mind playing two twlb games a week.

                Comment


                • #38
                  Originally posted by Cig Smoke
                  There is a hell of alot more basing squads now then there was back then. I can name 16 rite now who would make it a good league.

                  1.spastic
                  2.diso
                  3.pallies
                  4.-f-
                  5.mambo
                  6.a-s
                  7.dice
                  8.venom
                  9.juice
                  10. sk8
                  11.rb
                  12.bc
                  13.incuria
                  14.melee
                  15.ancients
                  16.pirates

                  Edit: and all 16 of these are squads who are together for a pretty long time and they are pretty stable. Alot of them its there 1st LB but they been in other leagues (like pirates,anc) i think its clear 16 would work.

                  Also u dont need to have 1 big group. I think it works fine with conferences.
                  melee and ancients?

                  I looked at ancients squad history and it hasn't beat a single one of these squads, and in its recent games got 0:26 agaist bcrew and 1:15 against dice.

                  as for melee, it went 1-9 last season (it won against defiancy), and only passed the 4 minute mark against 1 other squad. and I only see 3 basers on its roster, and bosshawk seems to have left.
                  1:Zerzera> aura shut up
                  1:Zerzera> you hate my recruits because I am muslim
                  jdigs3> jdigs offers u his protection

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    14 squads is my vote.. even if it'd make Sk8 win more games prolly. I do agree with what most of real basers think.
                    1:PaulOakenfold> thunder doesn't have a map;... gonna join nc17
                    1:PaulOakenfold> it's been real
                    1:Vitja> thunders map is ?go twlj
                    1:Vitja> afk
                    1:Underground> haha vit
                    1:Kian> LOL VITJA

                    -Sk8 site and forums: www.sk8squad.org

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      yea ancients cheating their way in damn fags
                      Mirror <ZH> omg it shark
                      Mirror <ZH> this sucks
                      Server> dont worry mirror
                      Server> shark fits your tits
                      Peace <ZH>> shut up
                      Peace <ZH>> i do not apperciate you talking to my girlfriend in that manner

                      i.d.> Teach me how to not choke
                      Witness> well first you put it in your mouth ... but not to long

                      1:Hercules> ghoul
                      1:Hercules> im level 90
                      1:Hercules> in 9d
                      1:Hercules> bought a char off ebay
                      1:Hercules> cost me $50 but was worth it

                      Comment


                      • #41
                        Originally posted by foobarz
                        melee and ancients?

                        I looked at ancients squad history and it hasn't beat a single one of these squads, and in its recent games got 0:26 agaist bcrew and 1:15 against dice.

                        as for melee, it went 1-9 last season (it won against defiancy), and only passed the 4 minute mark against 1 other squad. and I only see 3 basers on its roster, and bosshawk seems to have left.
                        Well i posted that b4 all of melee's basers left. So i would agree that melee wouldnt be in there, but i think ancients still deserve a chance to improve in the league. Even with melee and anc in that list it isnt all that bad of a league.
                        _o_2NASRALLAH

                        Comment

                        Working...
                        X