Max B ?

[PrOnEsSim]

85 people..NO LIFE TW.. NO LIFE

ANYYWAYS
SOMEONE SAID THEY RECORDED IT, i think it was rico something POST IT!

[Efhat]

i should just ce when theirs 1 lazy ER in the damn arena and say nothing happend like max b covered it up

[PH]

Mirror <ER> is about as inept as PH's penis.

HOPE + PENIS = $$$$$$$

[MetalHeadz]

true, what a great message for staff to send out - do nothing to tackle REAL problems, yet they punish gv by removing them from twlb for doing the same thing...I s'pose it's early days...but something shudda been done there and then

[PredatoR_FNM]

Mirror <ER> did all good letting the game be played till the end, she will have her raport sent to twlstaff and it will be processed. Dont be blaming her now as she did good job.

[Creature]

the guy that said he recorded it was spLeAF. i sent him a ?message to see if he actually did or not. furthermore, i have half the match ?log'd if anywant wants to see chat heh...

[Hero*]

Mirror <ER> did all good letting the game be played till the end, he will have her raport to twl staff and it will be processed, dont be blaming him now she did good job.

hehe

[Dameon Angell]

a.) No matter what, the game has to play thru to the end.
b.) I didn't see it, but I know you lost, so whatever you say about this "cheating" is probably gonna be exaggerated a few levels, because you lost and you wanna find something to blame for your shortcomings.
c.) The TWL Staff will figure something out. Blaming Mirror won't get shit done for you.

[Rab]

I saw max b tank loads. I reported it.

He should not have been allowed to continue.

[PredatoR_FNM]

Hero, I was editing it becouse I heard he was really she, bugger off :/

[Dwopple]

i would actually go for the harsher punishment if he really was "cheating", since it was during a TWL match. But since there is MUCH lack of good LB squads out there.....bleh...CHEATS ARE FOR FAGS

[Sufficient]

I saw max b tank loads. I reported it.

He should not have been allowed to continue.

Refs almost never manually spec a player. In fact, I've never seen it done ever ... even though I *think* there is a rule that says that they can manually spec a player that shows extreme lag.

So whoever reffed did a good job by letting the game continue to the end.

Whatever decisions are made will be made after the game ... not right in the middle of it.

[Rab]

Refs almost never manually spec a player. In fact, I've never seen it done ever ... even though I *think* there is a rule that says that they can manually spec a player that shows extreme lag.

So whoever reffed did a good job by letting the game continue to the end.

Whatever decisions are made will be made after the game ... not right in the middle of it.

I don't like to see squads disqualified because of one player. I'd much rather the offending player was removed immediately, so the game can continue fairly. I'm sure that's how it used to be done?

[Sufficient]

I don't like to see squads disqualified because of one player. I'd much rather the offending player was removed immediately, so the game can continue fairly. I'm sure that's how it used to be done?

Can you give me an example of when a player was manually specced bc of their lag? If the bot doesn't spec the player, the ref won't. That's the way it's always been done (anything else is just subjective and potentially biased and/or rash judgement). Unless there is a quick and simple way to prove the guy cheated (during the middle of the game), the ref should just wait until the game is over.

[Ekko]

5:brookus> the official announcement is that pandora will be mocked for three days.. and have to clean the TW toilets for a week