Originally posted by Na$
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Suggestion for TWL qualifications
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by PjOtTeR View PostTWD is fine indeed.... just make the ranking not just about rating... but also about AVG rating of squads you played again...
Just doing (Rating * AVG rating of squads you played) would make the rankings a lot fairer...
This way the not so good squads wont be afraid of playing higher ranked/good squads cause their AVG rating of squads you played will increase... so even a loss vs such a squad might make your superrating(no idea what to call it) go up...
For example... looking at the twd ladder for ld at the moment, would make the following ranking....
Code:New Old squads gp gw gl w/l cws bws avg R Rating superrating 1 1. Synd 160 121 39 3.1 0 13 1247 1626 2027622 2 6. Sake 217 150 67 2.2 0 13 1288 1482 1908816 3 4. Dice 228 151 77 2 3 9 1251 1502 1879002 4 2. Thunder 208 142 66 2.2 0 11 1239 1514 1875846 5 3. Diso 176 123 53 2.3 3 13 1244 1505 1872220 6 5. Ash 168 102 66 1.5 10 10 1200 1490 1788000 7 9. Rampage 155 97 58 1.7 2 10 1238 1429 1769102 8 10. Rival 231 100 131 0.8 5 8 1260 1396 1758960 9 8. BoZ 157 106 51 2.1 3 10 1178 1440 1696320 10 7. Savang 521 352 169 2.1 1 20 1121 1477 1655717 11 13. Unleash 224 115 109 1.1 0 13 1285 1281 1646085 12 11. SYnE 184 105 79 1.3 0 13 1217 1332 1621044 13 14. Ancs 116 63 53 1.2 0 8 1215 1277 1551555 14 15. Squad!! 347 188 159 1.2 0 9 1175 1259 1479325 15 12. Warpath 369 164 205 0.8 0 6 1140 1283 1462620 16 16. Penet 59 33 26 1.3 0 4 1035 1159 1199565
This too me seems more fair... you see some of the supposedly worse squads drop a few places and some "good" squads increase a few...
This is already a way more fair way then how it's done atm... and when it's done this way, only change would be rival getting in over savanger... but i think it shouldn't be done this season, cause then you'd be screwing sav.. but implement it next season so people know about it.. and they are not so afraid to play the squads on top of the ladder...
Comment
-
I like pj's idea but I don't think rating and avg should be given equal weight.
I'd prefer something like 2(rating)*avg, but I'm not set on 2, that number should be determined by a statistical expert. Obviously it should be over 1.afksry
Comment
Channels
Collapse
Comment