Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Incentivizing rather than limiting/restricting/changing TWL $$$

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Incentivizing rather than limiting/restricting/changing TWL $$$

    Instead of limiting rosters or forcing a draft or doing anything negative/restrictive, we incentivize?

    There are events going on with 25, 50 and 100$ prizes to weekend pub events, which are short-term, one-off things -- why not use it toward TWL? Moreover, use an idea along the line of something that worked, i.e. Quake making the TWLD finals.

    Keep TWL the same, but make a cash prize offer to the winner of every league, like 200$ or something -- if they take a core of 10 players and get the rest from a draft -- and use 1/5 draftees in LJ/LD games and 2/8 in LB games every week.

    All of a sudden, you're going to have cores of players, maybe a Stayon or a Trasher or a Megaman saying -- hey, wait a minute, I can take these 10 guys and win a league and carry some draftee -- I'll win TWL like I do half the time anyway even with the restrictions and get some cash.

    Now, let's say Dice or Fierce or whoever for the most part want nothing to do with this, don't care about the money, and want to keep their stacked squad and do what they always do, that's fine, but there's certainly going to be a strong possibility that a lot of people who claim to be part of a group of people they really like on these mega-squads and thinking "well, if i really think about it these are really the 10 core people I like to play/chat with" or get together with other talented people and break off and make their own squad.

    Moreover, say you make it only the core guys can get the prize (unless they want to share) -- so maybe a squad only interested in LD like Raazi Rasaq Sir SPid Cres Coroner think they can show every week and draft the rest, they split more money between each other by having a core of less than 10.

    What's powerful about this idea is there can be almost no pushback or resistance from the established groups because you're not taking anything away from them -- Dice/Thunder can go on and be as dominant as they always have been if they want to -- but you're adding something that could really spark some strong new groups that aren't sitting on the sidelines collecting medals AND involving new people on those squads getting experience and to play with better players than they normally would.

    (*And give the money to the highest placed squad that went into TWL as part of the challenge, obviously -- So if Sweet makes to the final with 10 core guys and draftees and loses to Fierce who is stacked and isnt part of it, they get all the money, not Fierce, and not nobody.)
    top 100 basers list

  • #2
    Unrealistic.

    Comment


    • #3
      claus pathetic idea sorry bro

      Comment


      • #4
        claus you seem to have a lot of energy you should join staff so when shit hits the fan gun will have an inside man who will give me money

        Comment


        • #5
          I don't see why this is unrealistic. In my opinion this idea (in some form) could be very useful. Would you guys mind elaborating a bit?

          This idea is definitely on the right track. The key is to level out the playing field some more without forcing people to anything. One problem I see with this is that it might result in a lot of no-shows once a squad realizes they can't win.
          6:megaman89> im 3 league veteran back off

          Originally posted by Dreamwin
          3 league vet

          Comment


          • #6
            what would stop the top and most active players from each league coming together and making a crazy 3 league squad? If the core of Fierce, Dice and Thunder all got together to win $, then the roster would remain small, and the competition would diminish.

            gotta be realistic.

            Comment


            • #7
              I do not think that the incentive should be to ‘win’. In my opinion rewarding ‘winning’ is the exact opposite of what should be incentivize. In other words, making the ‘rich’ richer serves as no incentive. It is also not a direct benefit but rather relies upon the abstraction of perceived benefits ‘trickling down’ to random players in pub.
              Instead, directly reward ‘playing time’ (time a person is actively playing pub, elim, BDs, events, whatever it might be). I presented this idea in the other thread, use a lottery approach where every hour of playing time gets you one TW lotto ticket for a cash weekly/monthly drawing (details TBD).
              eph

              Comment


              • #8
                Everything will be fixed with more population, everyone getting diablo 3 should pledge to engage the shit out of word-of-mouth marketing

                Comment


                • #9
                  riv/eph, not to come off as defensive, but did you read what i wrote? how do you create a mega-3-league squad with 10 people?
                  top 100 basers list

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    i don't know how the draft works in TW, do squad captains select players? or are players randomly distributed to squads?

                    if the squad captains have the power to select players (as i assume), then this idea fails...since mega stars could easily alias and all join one squad.

                    if players are randomly distributed to squads, this may be an idea worth looking further into. i'm sure there's flaws here and there, but on the surface level, it seems interesting.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by Claushouse View Post
                      riv/eph, not to come off as defensive, but did you read what i wrote? how do you create a mega-3-league squad with 10 people?
                      megaman, ease, jamal, trasher, cape, stayon, a2m, fludd/dwopple, apok, deez nuts

                      Oh man. i'm laying the foundation for what could be the Megazord of all squads.

                      God help us all.
                      4:BigKing> xD
                      4:Best> i'm leaving chat
                      4:BigKing> what did i do???
                      4:Best> told you repeatedly you cannot use that emoji anymore
                      4:BigKing> ???? why though
                      4:Best> you're 6'4 and black...you can't use emojis like that
                      4:BigKing> xD

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        gsdgsdfg
                        NOSTALGIA IN THE WORST FASHION

                        internet de la jerome

                        because the internet | hazardous

                        Comment

                        Working...
                        X