Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Appeal for Spastic vs Sweet
Collapse
X
-
Was I right, or was I right? ^^Originally posted by veetee View PostThis reasoning is beyond stupid and frustating. I think we should share Sage's fate (though being based on different circumstances) and just boycott this joke that is TWL nowadays (not that I have played it for long, but long enough to witness a considerable drop in the quality of this league's management).
Seeing this, I really do not have any desire to log on any further and be a part of this joke league (no, this is not a retirement post), since such situations really add an asterisk to the final outcome. It is really pathethic to see how unprofessional you guys can be. Perhaps I will rethink my statement once the internet angering cools down so I do not deliver any more no-showups/LVPs for my friends.
Leave a comment:
-
Don't know what is more embarrassing, running a squad that everyone knows is not yours or being bad at the only ship you play and life.
So does this mean our LJ vs Dudgeon will be replayed, as we were provided false information. (This is the basis for Spastic winning the appeal, I am assuming?)
Leave a comment:
-
Sweet sucks and has no chance of winning any league, spastic only playing twl for fun so honestly shouldnt make such a huge fuss about this. Give sweet the win they will lose soon as they play one of the better squads. LF quit acting like your anything but laughable in every league, your opinion doesnt count and neither does your squad. Thanks for playing.
Leave a comment:
-
Layla, you've got me on my knees.
Layla, I'm begging, darling please.
Layla, darling won't you ease my worried mind.
Leave a comment:
-
Well, your decision is ignorant, deeply unreasonable and one-sided.
We WOULD HAVE NEVER PLAYED Eelam if we weren't given the green light by M_M God in this case. He was not needed because we still had enough depth to find a capable replacement that would be enough to face Spastic. We already didn't put him in lj, but we were told near the end of lj (score 32-40 or close) that he actually IS ALLOWED TO PLAY (all this fuss strongly contributed to my stellar 5-10 lvp that match since i was busy handling squadron's emotions). So, what if I actually subbed him in that LJ - would it also be replayed despite the loss? I actually really regret not doing so.
We can clearly see from this situation that Sweet is the victim of one of the TWL ops' (M_M God's) misjudgement (though I am not annoyed at him for carrying it out). You did not even try to reach a compromise (e.g. best of 3 suggested by Burnt), which further shows how bad-natured, biased and devoid of imagination.
This reasoning is beyond stupid and frustating. I think we should share Sage's fate (though being based on different circumstances) and just boycott this joke that is TWL nowadays (not that I have played it for long, but long enough to witness a considerable drop in the quality of this league's management).
Seeing this, I really do not have any desire to log on any further and be a part of this joke league (no, this is not a retirement post), since such situations really add an asterisk to the final outcome. It is really pathethic to see how unprofessional you guys can be. Perhaps I will rethink my statement once the internet angering cools down so I do not deliver any more no-showups/LVPs for my friends.
Meanwhile, enjoy playing Trench Wars Laugh.
Good night.
Eric Clapton.
Leave a comment:
-
You should AT LEAST make Spastic beat us 2 out of 3 (with the first game already being played) for it to count since that is what you're doing to Sweet.The TWL op consensus is that Eelam was added as an ineligible player to the match, and that the match between Sweet and Spastic will be replayed. Both teams' TWL rosters as of round 2 have been recorded, and only those players will be eligible to be added into the replay. Captains, please come to a consensus on when you want the replay over the next 2 weeks, otherwise I will assign a time.
Leave a comment:
-
you're actually one of the worst TWL Ops we've seen in a while. bad decision after bad decision.Originally posted by Summa View PostThe TWL op consensus is that Eelam was added as an ineligible player to the match, and that the match between Sweet and Spastic will be replayed. Both teams' TWL rosters as of round 2 have been recorded, and only those players will be eligible to be added into the replay. Captains, please come to a consensus on when you want the replay over the next 2 weeks, otherwise I will assign a time.
so goddamn moronic. it's not our fault your ability to run TWL and communicate with your other staff members is non-existent.
Leave a comment:
-
Joke.Originally posted by Summa View PostThe TWL op consensus is that Eelam was added as an ineligible player to the match, and that the match between Sweet and Spastic will be replayed. Both teams' TWL rosters as of round 2 have been recorded, and only those players will be eligible to be added into the replay. Captains, please come to a consensus on when you want the replay over the next 2 weeks, otherwise I will assign a time.
Leave a comment:
-
This.Originally posted by Riverside View PostOn behalf of Thunder, I'm appealing the game vs Stray where delectable was granted permission by Pure_Luck and pascone (TWL Head OP) to play in that Finals game despite being TW banned. It doesn't matter that it already happened that the decision was already made, presidents pascone and Pure_Luck went against the rules, and MUST be stopped. I didn't personally participate in the game, but I want to see justice being served.
I await your decision, and hope you make the right call. Let TWLD Finals Season 12? be replayed, for the sake of principle.
One of the very few times I'm going to agree w/ Riverside
Leave a comment:
-
If pl was pulling strings he would have gotten sweet to forfeit giving spastic the default win and infinite bursts.
Leave a comment:
Channels
Collapse

Leave a comment: