Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Player Pool Broken Down Into * Ratings (See your dreams crash and burn)

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • hectic
    replied
    i think that lower ratings are going to be good b/c it's going to distinguish between good and bad captains. I personally feel i'm better than 6*, but i'm glad for it, b/c whoever i'm playing for, hopefully, is going to feel like he got a good deal for me, and he/she did his/her job scouting the good deal.

    the elites are going to be elite, the difference will most likely lie in the lower level players.

    don't be like kobe bryant, just trying to be the highest worth. be the most for your money, like, D. Rodman yo.

    w00t first post in forum!

    Leave a comment:


  • Mantra-Slider
    replied
    haha this is awesome

    edit: btw I think you should let us know who is responsable for the rankings!
    Last edited by Mantra-Slider; 07-07-2008, 08:53 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Attacks
    replied
    Its just a rough guideline, tbh id rather have a 5 then I wouldn't have anything to lose by playing, the whole tournament is about getting ready for twl, why get upset by someones opinion, its more the fun to prove someone wrong, than not live up to expectation

    Leave a comment:


  • Zeebu
    replied
    all bout them 6's

    Leave a comment:


  • Summa
    replied
    updated as of this morning

    Leave a comment:


  • HateTheFake
    replied
    Originally posted by Lag.Com View Post
    5*? Sounds fair to me. I'm a pretty good javelin at times, but I wouldn't yet call myself 'solid' in basing (except if I play lanc :greedy:,) and I never play wb.

    Is it so strange to be happy with the rating you've been assigned? I thought nobody knew me, so it's a nice boost for me.

    Edit: Though being put in the same rating bracket as Hate the Fake makes me frown. Actually I can probably beat most of the people in 5* in a duel.
    haha tilde <3

    Leave a comment:


  • Lag.Com
    replied
    5*? Sounds fair to me. I'm a pretty good javelin at times, but I wouldn't yet call myself 'solid' in basing (except if I play lanc :greedy:,) and I never play wb.

    Is it so strange to be happy with the rating you've been assigned? I thought nobody knew me, so it's a nice boost for me.

    Edit: Though being put in the same rating bracket as Hate the Fake makes me frown. Actually I can probably beat most of the people in 5* in a duel.

    Leave a comment:


  • Dabram
    replied
    good thing i haven't signed up yet, since i'm a twl-star in wb, jav, spider, terr and shark! with my incredible awesomeness i'd screw up the entire rating-system!

    :turned:

    ps. seriously though if i sign up give me a huge penalty for being an inactive fuck, chances i will show up each week in a summer-league will be unlikely

    Leave a comment:


  • Guest's Avatar
    Guest replied
    I hope people (particularly the stupid ones) will understand this rough outline.

    COMPARE AND CONTRAST
    If you are the best of the best; the great of the great... in a javelin only... you're considered to be an 8*.
    If you are the best of the best; the great of the great... in a warbird only... you're considered to be an 8*.
    If you are the best of the best; the great of the great... in a terrier only... you're considered to be an 8*.
    If you are the best of the best; the great of the great... in a javelin AND a warbird... you're considered to be an 10*.

    (Notice how it jumped two stars for knowing the extra ship)
    If you were just good and ONE of many good players in the... spider AND jav... you're considered to be an 9*

    Leave a comment:


  • bicycle
    replied
    O I also find it interesting how only 1 out of the 10s and 9s is a warbird. very interesting indeed.

    Leave a comment:


  • Kid Kaos
    replied
    HI TOP! :wub:

    Leave a comment:


  • Summa
    replied
    a) you havent applied
    b) take your negativity somewhere else
    c) yes a lot of them are

    Leave a comment:


  • TopGod
    replied
    a) why am I not on the list
    b) any league based on an arbitrary rating system will fail
    c) the best players aren't even on the list

    Leave a comment:


  • Downfall
    replied
    Originally posted by Dreamwin View Post
    "Note: There is some gray area here. People who qualified for 5*'s but we felt were better than 5* may have been elevated and etc"

    In this case D_R was prolly considered better than "solid twl player(7*)" and that's why he is 8*.
    Still havent answered the question on underground :P


    can i register ppl Zuave:no

    Leave a comment:


  • bicycle
    replied
    Interesting. I wasn't aware I was as good as jaa but I guess that's what happens.

    Jaa should be a 9.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X