I'm not playing so I don't actually care, but out of curiosity - how are a bunch of 1-shippers 9s and 10s, but an elite 3-shipper like wbm is an 8? Jw
Did you even notice how few 9s and 10s there were? Kinda makes me sad that everyone good quit years ago. Also, technically speaking here, a 1-shipper that is better at that ship than a great 3 leaguer deserves the 9 or 10 in that ship. If it's all they play, they're probably better at it in ways a 3 leaguer wouldn't understand. Also, the only legit 3 leaguer I saw was Ease. Everyone else are not the top 5 of certain ships in each league, so it balances out.
RaCka> imagine standing out as a retard on subspace
RaCka> mad impressive
Ogron, could you do me a solid and highlight the captains in some color so some of us can just look at this sheet for drafting? Thanks a ton for all the work. <3
1:waven> u challenge
1:waven> if i challenge it looks too scary
Originally posted by MHz
Hope you contract ebola from your, no doubt cheap, Easter Egg, you fucking shit-jav, pug-faced cunt.
Yeah, I think the ratings are definitely better than last year, where it was simply an aggregate of the Captain's ratings. The camel by committee approach absolves TWDT Ops of responsibility ("I didn't do the ratings, the captains did!"), but it produces an inferior result because 1) there is no internal consistency (some people are more generous or Scrooge-y than others) and 2) It rounds up or down (6.5 produces a 7-star, while a 6.49 produces a 6 star).
Doing it with a small group by hand is simply better. There is some subjectivity and certain players who are borderline (you can make a case that they could be an 8 instead of a 7) and so there are going to be some value picks for Captain's to take advantage of. But, like Commodo said, I think last year there were some really exploitable low-star players that were unbalanced, and we worked hard to make sure we eliminated most (if not all) of them.
My thanks to Stayon, Zidane, Turban, Ease, and Weak for their help.
Yes Tiny, I can highlight the Captains for you.
Also, I will be creating and posting the low-star packages tonight.
Yeah, I think the ratings are definitely better than last year, where it was simply an aggregate of the Captain's ratings. The camel by committee approach absolves TWDT Ops of responsibility ("I didn't do the ratings, the captains did!"), but it produces an inferior result because 1) there is no internal consistency (some people are more generous or Scrooge-y than others) and 2) It rounds up or down (6.5 produces a 7-star, while a 6.49 produces a 6 star).
Doing it with a small group by hand is simply better. There is some subjectivity and certain players who are borderline (you can make a case that they could be an 8 instead of a 7) and so there are going to be some value picks for Captain's to take advantage of. But, like Commodo said, I think last year there were some really exploitable low-star players that were unbalanced, and we worked hard to make sure we eliminated most (if not all) of them.
My thanks to Stayon, Zidane, Turban, Ease, and Weak for their help.
Yes Tiny, I can highlight the Captains for you.
Also, I will be creating and posting the low-star packages tonight.
U dun gud Claus.
Since a complaint is required to post in TWDT Rating threads, here's mine: I should be like a 3 star in Jav.
RaCka> imagine standing out as a retard on subspace
RaCka> mad impressive
Comment