Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

TWDT 2016 Star Ratings

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • TWDT 2016 Star Ratings



    Here are your TWDT 2016 Star Ratings:



    https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets...it?usp=sharing



    Let the crying begin!



    top 100 basers list

  • #2
    Wow, I'm better than Ease. Ty 4 dis!
    "Action is the real measure of intelligence. "
    Napoleon Hill


    wiibimbo>I'm gonna take u out next week for a beer and pizza at Leonardo's...no homo tho! I prefer big boobs
    Dral>I can get implants

    Comment


    • #3
      Ratings look good. I'm seeing a few peeps I can exploit but nothing major. Perhaps a little generous on the 10*s in jav, but that's irrelevant anyway.

      Edit: Nvm.
      Last edited by MHz; 01-07-2016, 11:17 AM.
      You come at the King, you best not miss.

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by MHz View Post
        Perhaps a little generous on the 10*s in jav
        There's 5 10*'s in dtd/dtj and 12 in dtb. You jealous?
        1:waven> u challenge
        1:waven> if i challenge it looks too scary

        Originally posted by MHz
        Hope you contract ebola from your, no doubt cheap, Easter Egg, you fucking shit-jav, pug-faced cunt.

        Comment


        • #5
          I'm not playing so I don't actually care, but out of curiosity - how are a bunch of 1-shippers 9s and 10s, but an elite 3-shipper like wbm is an 8? Jw

          Comment


          • #6
            It's based on each league. apparently a 3 shipper like wbm who hasn't played much has deteriorated in his 3 league force? dunno
            1:waven> u challenge
            1:waven> if i challenge it looks too scary

            Originally posted by MHz
            Hope you contract ebola from your, no doubt cheap, Easter Egg, you fucking shit-jav, pug-faced cunt.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by Pressure View Post
              I'm not playing so I don't actually care, but out of curiosity - how are a bunch of 1-shippers 9s and 10s, but an elite 3-shipper like wbm is an 8? Jw
              Did you even notice how few 9s and 10s there were? Kinda makes me sad that everyone good quit years ago. Also, technically speaking here, a 1-shipper that is better at that ship than a great 3 leaguer deserves the 9 or 10 in that ship. If it's all they play, they're probably better at it in ways a 3 leaguer wouldn't understand. Also, the only legit 3 leaguer I saw was Ease. Everyone else are not the top 5 of certain ships in each league, so it balances out.
              RaCka> imagine standing out as a retard on subspace
              RaCka> mad impressive

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by Tiny View Post
                It's based on each league. apparently a 3 shipper like wbm who hasn't played much has deteriorated in his 3 league force? dunno
                Is wbm better at wb than racka (for instance)? If not, then racka deserves the 10 in wb while wbm does not. Makes sense to me?
                RaCka> imagine standing out as a retard on subspace
                RaCka> mad impressive

                Comment


                • #9
                  Agreed
                  1:waven> u challenge
                  1:waven> if i challenge it looks too scary

                  Originally posted by MHz
                  Hope you contract ebola from your, no doubt cheap, Easter Egg, you fucking shit-jav, pug-faced cunt.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Proper ratings. Am 6 star WB/JAV specialist at your service. Easy wins brah.
                    - You need people like me. So you can point your finger and say that's the bad guy.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Ogron, could you do me a solid and highlight the captains in some color so some of us can just look at this sheet for drafting? Thanks a ton for all the work. <3
                      1:waven> u challenge
                      1:waven> if i challenge it looks too scary

                      Originally posted by MHz
                      Hope you contract ebola from your, no doubt cheap, Easter Egg, you fucking shit-jav, pug-faced cunt.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Yeah, I think the ratings are definitely better than last year, where it was simply an aggregate of the Captain's ratings. The camel by committee approach absolves TWDT Ops of responsibility ("I didn't do the ratings, the captains did!"), but it produces an inferior result because 1) there is no internal consistency (some people are more generous or Scrooge-y than others) and 2) It rounds up or down (6.5 produces a 7-star, while a 6.49 produces a 6 star).

                        Doing it with a small group by hand is simply better. There is some subjectivity and certain players who are borderline (you can make a case that they could be an 8 instead of a 7) and so there are going to be some value picks for Captain's to take advantage of. But, like Commodo said, I think last year there were some really exploitable low-star players that were unbalanced, and we worked hard to make sure we eliminated most (if not all) of them.

                        My thanks to Stayon, Zidane, Turban, Ease, and Weak for their help.

                        Yes Tiny, I can highlight the Captains for you.

                        Also, I will be creating and posting the low-star packages tonight.
                        top 100 basers list

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          why the hell am i not a 10 star wb? I demand a recount
                          idkidc1233

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by Claushouse View Post
                            Yeah, I think the ratings are definitely better than last year, where it was simply an aggregate of the Captain's ratings. The camel by committee approach absolves TWDT Ops of responsibility ("I didn't do the ratings, the captains did!"), but it produces an inferior result because 1) there is no internal consistency (some people are more generous or Scrooge-y than others) and 2) It rounds up or down (6.5 produces a 7-star, while a 6.49 produces a 6 star).

                            Doing it with a small group by hand is simply better. There is some subjectivity and certain players who are borderline (you can make a case that they could be an 8 instead of a 7) and so there are going to be some value picks for Captain's to take advantage of. But, like Commodo said, I think last year there were some really exploitable low-star players that were unbalanced, and we worked hard to make sure we eliminated most (if not all) of them.

                            My thanks to Stayon, Zidane, Turban, Ease, and Weak for their help.

                            Yes Tiny, I can highlight the Captains for you.

                            Also, I will be creating and posting the low-star packages tonight.
                            U dun gud Claus.

                            Since a complaint is required to post in TWDT Rating threads, here's mine: I should be like a 3 star in Jav.
                            RaCka> imagine standing out as a retard on subspace
                            RaCka> mad impressive

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              I thought it was pretty obvious I was talking about wbm's basing rating (as an example)

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X