Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

RATINGS

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Rab
    replied
    ardir is one of the best value twdt players

    Leave a comment:


  • Hulk
    replied
    ardir is 3 league pro

    Leave a comment:


  • ixt
    replied
    i dont pay attention to basing much so excuse that...but regardless of basing ratings off recent performances, im sure those who created them (ease, ogron) takes into account the skill cap of players in a ship to rate them on the scale. this probably has a bigger effect compared to "past performance"

    Leave a comment:


  • Ardour
    replied
    Originally posted by ixt View Post

    ur 7/8/(unknown) dunno how well u base at the minimum no way in hell r u 6 in jav
    Lol unknown?! If we being serious, I triple crowned last season. Terrorists lineup was the same in each division and owned every match so easily... I never agree that a rank that is involved with how the league runs should ever be based on anyone's opinion. Should always be based on past performance which we have got more enough stats of and loads of people coming up with impressive spreadsheets analysing them. I only push for a lower rating so it improves my chances of getting more play time.

    Leave a comment:


  • Claushouse
    replied
    Signups and Ratings are LOCKED.


    Important notes:

    -Holy Ship was the final signup and is rated 7/7/7
    -Peru quit and is not draftable
    -Ease is not playing
    -Rasaq and Mean Gene both said they weren't playing but later signed up, and are in the draft and selectable


    I think that's all the pertinent info, Ease has the ratings changes he made in the main post.

    Thanks!

    Leave a comment:


  • ixt
    replied
    Originally posted by Ardour View Post
    I agree with Turpin. Please demote me from 8* honours. I should be 6-6-6 max.
    ur 7/8/(unknown) dunno how well u base at the minimum no way in hell r u 6 in jav

    Leave a comment:


  • Rab
    replied
    felix, jav, 6->7

    Leave a comment:


  • Ardour
    replied
    I agree with Turpin. Please demote me from 8* honours. I should be 6-6-6 max.

    Leave a comment:


  • ixt
    replied
    tru dat, more of the midrange players get to play (assuming most of each team actually show to games)

    Leave a comment:


  • Rab
    replied
    the real major change is having 8 teams instead of 6, so the higher star players aren't so densely packed.

    Leave a comment:


  • ixt
    replied
    Originally posted by Singer View Post
    One thing I've been thinking is how it seems like everyone's rating has been mostly going up and almost none are going down.. shouldn't that affect the star cap limit as well, move it up to 41* instead of 40* atleast? Just a thought
    the real major change was to remove any 5* rating where it starts at 6. As Ease and claus stated ratings were not perfect, and prob wont be exactly finalized up till draft day where the actual teams must be picked. 40* seems reasonable as a typical line (ideally) for wb/jav could be 10/8/8/7/7 or interchange the 10 and 8 with two 9's. gotta find the best lineup where certain players mesh well with each other + activity.

    Leave a comment:


  • ixt
    replied
    Originally posted by Attacks View Post

    I'm probably rated 10 because ive hit at least one game for the last 3 season where ive gone 20+ turban.

    I'd stick to suggestions for javs and base if I were you.

    Edit: juat played a game for the first time in 4 weeks, I suck. Put me as 7*
    7* in wb? yeah no way in hell ur 8* at least. minimum.

    Leave a comment:


  • Exalt
    replied
    I mean, some of the ratings are pretty bad and only based on skill from a decade ago, not today. I see some 8* players that literally went 2-10 and died out first in every single twl game they played in, making them a 6* in reality, but due to being good long ago, they remain at a high rating. It would be fine if you could say they have the potential to be better, because they light it up in other areas like elim or something, but they are really bad there too. Some captain will pick them, because they dont pay attention to real skill vs reputation, and their team will be hurt for it. These players themselves are hurt for it too, because they'll never play a single game once captains realized they're a detriment to their team at that high of a star rating. You mine as well play a legit 6* with potential than an 8* with none. Honestly, I dont know why anyone would want a higher rating either, because it's better to be underrated than overrated.

    Leave a comment:


  • Vys
    replied
    Not sure how I should be an 8 star rating in base. I've not based for over 2 years, due to being rated an 8 star player. This should be reviewed. There's no way my basing game is the same as my jav game. 10-8-7 was a good rating.

    Leave a comment:


  • MHz
    replied
    Ratings, and the amendments, look good.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X