[QUOTE=Vehicle;n1359979]Let's ask ourselves a question: Who's been "forced to sit out this season"? Is it the 7- to 9-star player who's been forced to sit out in several seasons past? Or is it some of the 9- and 10-star players who have traditionally been playing every weekend of every league and been in the running to collect winnings for every past season?
[/QUOTE]
It's not that 10*s or 7*s are being benched differently this season (though its true that 7*s are less commonly competing for prize money).
There are 6 teams this season, which means only 48 basers are competing any given week. Compared to the next season, 80 will play each week (30 -> 50 in dueling leagues). Everyone is benching more this season, it's just the 10*s who have been more vocal (and probably have more to gain from more playing spots).
Furthermore, as Dwopple mentioned, money breakdown for the next league will look different. With a larger prize pool, more money can be allocated towards awards for high performing low stars, where this season has been entirely about who wins.
[/QUOTE]
It's not that 10*s or 7*s are being benched differently this season (though its true that 7*s are less commonly competing for prize money).
There are 6 teams this season, which means only 48 basers are competing any given week. Compared to the next season, 80 will play each week (30 -> 50 in dueling leagues). Everyone is benching more this season, it's just the 10*s who have been more vocal (and probably have more to gain from more playing spots).
Furthermore, as Dwopple mentioned, money breakdown for the next league will look different. With a larger prize pool, more money can be allocated towards awards for high performing low stars, where this season has been entirely about who wins.
Comment