Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Continuum: Mac Client?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Continuum: Mac Client?

    Well, here's an idea.

    Now, I'm not an expert at programming, but I do know a thing or two.
    I have no idea, however, how much effort it would take to re-compile a Continuum: Mac client.
    If the game was programmed in Java, I believe it would be fairly easy, whereas if it was programmed in C++ or something to that effect, it would require some sort of SDK mac port kit (which are open source, anyway).


    Anyway, on to the pro's and cons:

    Pro's:

    Small, freeware games like this recieve much adulation and love on the Mac platforum, the reason being that is it not nearly as over-saturated in the gaming market. On top of that, a lot of mac users prefer simpler games like this that don't require as much time, or attention, as heavier games (WoW, for instance).

    Hardly any competing games, with an ever-increasing user base.
    Sure, Windows has like an 85% market share domination, but they also have about thirty million games to choose from.
    I'd suggest that the ratio of Mac users to mac games is a lot larger than the ratio of PC users to PC games.

    Younger demographics.
    Windows owns a 85% market share, but how much of that demographic is a the gaming age? To be fair, a large chunk of that is older people that bought into the PC craze. The Mac platform, however, intentionally appeals to a younger audience, who would be more prone to playing a game, even if its only casual gaming.
    So while numbers alone would indicate that the PC game market is oversaturated, its even moreso because not all of that 85% are the gaming type.
    I'm not saying that 100% of mac users play games, or are looking for games, but I think its relevant enough that a game like this would be successful in an under-saturated games market with an ever-increasing userbase.



    Also, I'm not trying to say "MACS ARE BETTER OMG PCS R 4 FAGS", so don't bother trying to flame.

    In b4 "macfag".


    Share your thoughts.

    Maybe something like this would be ridiculously hard to do, and in which case we shouldn't bother.
    I think the idea deserves some merit.

  • #2
    macfag.

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by BestPlayerEver View Post
      Maybe something like this would be ridiculously hard to do, and in which case we shouldn't bother.
      No offense, but you aren't the first person to have come up with the idea to remake the client.
      USA WORLD CHAMPS

      Comment


      • #4
        Har har

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by D1st0rt View Post
          No offense, but you aren't the first person to have come up with the idea to remake the client.
          I never claimed to be.

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by BestPlayerEver View Post
            Well, here's an idea.


            Pro's:



            Well, I forgot the cons.
            I guess the biggest con would be the labor/effort to benefits ratio.

            Comment


            • #7
              I'm just saying the kind of person who would be capable of doing something like this is also the kind of person who would most likely have already thought of it, possibly years ago.

              Here's the closest current thing
              USA WORLD CHAMPS

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by D1st0rt View Post
                I'm just saying the kind of person who would be capable of doing something like this is also the kind of person who would most likely have already thought of it, possibly years ago.

                Here's the closest current thing
                Thanks for the interesting link.
                The problem with an open-source client, as specified on that website, is that no servers will let you connect, because an open-source client can be hacked very easily.
                Whereas an official client would have all those security measures set in place, etc etc.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by BestPlayerEver View Post
                  Thanks for the interesting link.
                  The problem with an open-source client, as specified on that website, is that no servers will let you connect, because an open-source client can be hacked very easily.
                  Whereas an official client would have all those security measures set in place, etc etc.
                  Thats not really an issue, its quite possible to run an open source client but have closed source cheat detection.

                  Has anyone tried using Darwine on the mac to run continuum??? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Darwine

                  I've ported a couple of (simple) apps from windows to linux. The process is far from straightforward, and all i had to deal with was Threads and Networking code. Which are pretty similar accross platforms.

                  I'll give my project a lil plug http://www.ssforum.net/index.php?showforum=398 but it is in a very early stages...

                  The biggest issue with porting Continuum is it uses on DirectDraw which is only on Windows.
                  Rediscover online gaming. Get Subspace

                  Mantra-Slider> you like it rough
                  Kitty> true

                  I girl with BooBiez> OH I GET IT U PRETEND TO BE A MAN


                  Flabby.tv - The Offical Flabby Website

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Con's:

                    Big waste of time for 0.2% increase in userbase.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      macfag.
                      plus, using java is wholly inefficient.
                      Originally posted by Jeenyuss
                      sometimes i thrust my hips so my flaccid dick slaps my stomach, then my taint, then my stomach, then my taint. i like the sound.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        All this said, it would be nice to see a .Net version of the client spring up.
                        -Dave

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by DoTheFandango View Post
                          macfag.
                          plus, using java is wholly inefficient.
                          Steve Jobs is your real father. Search your heart, you know it to be true.

                          Comment

                          Working...
                          X