If you want to use a public space to hold a protest maybe but if I want to stand out on Parliament Hill and say what I want about any political party no one can stop me. It's more of an issue when each person who wants to be a part of it has to register and can be denied the ability to demonstrate, the system is designed to create a climate of fear so no one will actually stand up. If you plan to hold a protest where there could be a turn out of thousands it would be a good idea to notify the police so they can close off any roads and notify local businesses and possibly step up patrols if there are going to be counter-protests. I don't think you can in any way compare the two. Freedom of Assembly doesn't give you the right to unduly disrupt the lives of others.
From everything that I have read and talking to those who have left China to live in Canada, Internet activities are closely monitored. As Vykromond said one site can be blocked today, unblocked tomorrow and so on. Again the idea is not to stop the free flow of information but to create an environment where no one will find it worth their time to challenge the stupidity and arbitrary nature of it. the CPC also recruits tens of thousands of people our age to scour the Internet for dissent. I don't think it's laughable to believe this kind of discussion could not exist under such conditions or that I could be arrested for it.
For the CPC to continue to exist they believe there can be no dissent. With a country of 1.3 billion I can understand their want to hold onto control. 1.3 billion people is a powerful group which could easily find a few elite unworthy of leadership. The Olympics was a performance for the people of China as much as it was for the world. They wanted to show they could pull off an amazing performance and they did. But I believe it was misguided to present it to the world while reneging on many of the basic freedoms they promised the IOC and the international community. For someone not a Chinese national I think it's a little condescending to do that and expect everyone to just forget about their human rights record and other terrible things they seem to do on purpose while parading their accomplishments and progress.
No one doubts the ability of China to put on a show or to do anything else. They have nothing to prove to us in their ability, they do however have a lot to improve on socially. Cops made a very good argument, the problem isn't that our "biased" perception of China has to change but that change has to happen there. Many of the freedoms we have in Canada and the United States are enshrined into our Constitution, not only that, those freedoms and our form of a liberal Democracy are tradition in the West. I don't see that progress because if the party feels for there to be any kind of social order, the status-quo, the CPC will always have to hold onto power and crush dissent thus never allowing the kind of freedoms we have here. You can't slowly change in that kind of environment.
A 1 party democracy is also one hell of an oxymoron. China is a single party state. It would make no difference if they were allowed to vote for a single party and call it a Democracy. A Democracy can not exist while one party rules alone.
While the Olympics have traditionally been held in contentious regions like the USSR, Nazi Germany and so on today I think it should stand to be a way of increasing international cooperation and a cultural exchange. I can't say it helped the USSR or Germany's relations with the West but I think we can do better in 2008. I don't think they should have been denied the award, it's important to a lot of people but the IOC has to in the future hold these countries to their commitments or they should be passed for another host city.
From everything that I have read and talking to those who have left China to live in Canada, Internet activities are closely monitored. As Vykromond said one site can be blocked today, unblocked tomorrow and so on. Again the idea is not to stop the free flow of information but to create an environment where no one will find it worth their time to challenge the stupidity and arbitrary nature of it. the CPC also recruits tens of thousands of people our age to scour the Internet for dissent. I don't think it's laughable to believe this kind of discussion could not exist under such conditions or that I could be arrested for it.
For the CPC to continue to exist they believe there can be no dissent. With a country of 1.3 billion I can understand their want to hold onto control. 1.3 billion people is a powerful group which could easily find a few elite unworthy of leadership. The Olympics was a performance for the people of China as much as it was for the world. They wanted to show they could pull off an amazing performance and they did. But I believe it was misguided to present it to the world while reneging on many of the basic freedoms they promised the IOC and the international community. For someone not a Chinese national I think it's a little condescending to do that and expect everyone to just forget about their human rights record and other terrible things they seem to do on purpose while parading their accomplishments and progress.
No one doubts the ability of China to put on a show or to do anything else. They have nothing to prove to us in their ability, they do however have a lot to improve on socially. Cops made a very good argument, the problem isn't that our "biased" perception of China has to change but that change has to happen there. Many of the freedoms we have in Canada and the United States are enshrined into our Constitution, not only that, those freedoms and our form of a liberal Democracy are tradition in the West. I don't see that progress because if the party feels for there to be any kind of social order, the status-quo, the CPC will always have to hold onto power and crush dissent thus never allowing the kind of freedoms we have here. You can't slowly change in that kind of environment.
A 1 party democracy is also one hell of an oxymoron. China is a single party state. It would make no difference if they were allowed to vote for a single party and call it a Democracy. A Democracy can not exist while one party rules alone.
While the Olympics have traditionally been held in contentious regions like the USSR, Nazi Germany and so on today I think it should stand to be a way of increasing international cooperation and a cultural exchange. I can't say it helped the USSR or Germany's relations with the West but I think we can do better in 2008. I don't think they should have been denied the award, it's important to a lot of people but the IOC has to in the future hold these countries to their commitments or they should be passed for another host city.
Comment