it's as ridiculous as a marxist utopia. and it is flawed on the same principle: the idea if achieving some "non-material" goal - by controlling materialism.
4:BigKing> xD
4:Best> i'm leaving chat
4:BigKing> what did i do???
4:Best> told you repeatedly you cannot use that emoji anymore
4:BigKing> ???? why though
4:Best> you're 6'4 and black...you can't use emojis like that
4:BigKing> xD
I mean, I just want to be able to enter a thread, randomly call you out as sociopaths, and not have anyone respond to it. Is that so hard for you kthx?
And paradise kills the thread with his intelligence.
lol i couldn't resist :wub:
4:BigKing> xD
4:Best> i'm leaving chat
4:BigKing> what did i do???
4:Best> told you repeatedly you cannot use that emoji anymore
4:BigKing> ???? why though
4:Best> you're 6'4 and black...you can't use emojis like that
4:BigKing> xD
i was in the library, reading a book by.. rummel? rommel? anyways, he figures that in the 20th century alone, deaths caused by government totalled 263 million people.
perhaps we should advocate gov-control. have a heart. especially since rommel (rummel?) concludes that a disproportionate amount of those deaths were children. (because, you know, their parents were defenseless.)
I am so liberal that I'm shocked - LITERALLY SHOCKED - that people would own guns. I mean fuck, I thought guns were invented so nobody could have them except African children, terrorists, and the government.
Comment