Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

This is ConcreteSchlyrd. If you can read this, then you're a part of the resistance.

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Pressure
    replied
    Originally posted by Ilya View Post
    you can't have a terminator movie without arnold

    it's a crime
    .....CGI?

    Leave a comment:


  • Ilya
    replied
    you can't have a terminator movie without arnold

    it's a crime

    Leave a comment:


  • Vykromond
    replied
    Originally posted by ConcreteSchlyrd View Post
    I know times is rough, but why? Why would you take that role? If you're a musical legend in the making, why take part in some jerkoff McG movie? The dollars can't be that good.
    O_o

    Leave a comment:


  • ConcreteSchlyrd
    replied
    Originally posted by Jeenyuss View Post
    common was terribly hilarious.
    Agreed. Ridiculous. What was the point of his character, anyway?

    I know times is rough, but why? Why would you take that role? If you're a musical legend in the making, why take part in some jerkoff McG movie? The dollars can't be that good.

    Leave a comment:


  • Jeenyuss
    replied
    Originally posted by PaulOakenfold View Post
    Theoretically, if Star Trek was a 5 out of 5, what would you give Terminator in comparison for those that saw it?
    there was one part that was good it was about 15 minutes

    then at the end there was another part that was good and it lasted for about 10 minutes.

    common was terribly hilarious.

    Leave a comment:


  • Vykromond
    replied
    Originally posted by genocidal View Post
    Why? He's the biggest fuckass in the world. Anyone who takes their acting job that seriously needs their ass kicked and then reamed.
    yeah no one should take their line of work seriously especially if they make millions of dollars from it

    Leave a comment:


  • PaulOakenfold
    replied
    Theoretically, if Star Trek was a 5 out of 5, what would you give Terminator in comparison for those that saw it?

    Leave a comment:


  • DoTheFandango
    replied
    the teaser made it seem so badass, though.
    also, was high as fuck.

    Leave a comment:


  • Jeenyuss
    replied
    i think i will still see this.

    harry potter!!!!!!!

    out of all the summer flicks though i'd like to see public enemy or whatever with johnny depp and bale. that movie will undoubtedly give me a throbbing face erection.

    Leave a comment:


  • Exotic
    replied
    Instead, watch 'The Machinist', shit's good!

    Leave a comment:


  • Squeezer
    replied
    Originally posted by ConcreteSchlyrd View Post
    My wife worked on the breakout TV-hit show Fastlane (McG's up, hoes down... am I right or what, fellas?)--his assistant freaked out on her one day for calling him "Joseph."

    "His NAME is McG, ALRIGHT? Call him by his NAME! McG!"

    Hilarious.
    i am mcg

    dont call me josef

    Leave a comment:


  • kthx
    replied
    Why didn't you go whip that mcgaylords ass.

    Leave a comment:


  • ConcreteSchlyrd
    replied
    Originally posted by Epinephrine View Post
    McG's first 'big' movie was Charlie's Angels. I rest my case.
    My wife worked on the breakout TV-hit show Fastlane (McG's up, hoes down... am I right or what, fellas?)--his assistant freaked out on her one day for calling him "Joseph."

    "His NAME is McG, ALRIGHT? Call him by his NAME! McG!"

    Hilarious.

    Leave a comment:


  • ConcreteSchlyrd
    replied
    Originally posted by Jerome Scuggs View Post
    i might see it just because i want to see modern CGI do a fuckin' terminator battle. or was there a lack of action?
    It was a wierd mix of XXX-style (Vinny D represent), over-the-top action and the seemingly stunt d'jour: the "throw your opponent(s) against a wall or some other hard object."

    Leave a comment:


  • brookus
    replied
    You and me, we're fucking done professionally.

    llater,
    Tony

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X