I am bored and people are just like fish

[T3l Ca7]

All living things have some things in common, things such as reproduction, need to eat, avoiding predators. But other than these commonalities with all other animals, I see nothing in your analogy that makes much sense.
You try to draw a parallel between fish swimming in schools and people on a train? I am missing the logic here. Fish school for a reason, for the purpose of defense. People ride trains as a defense? No, people ride a train for the purpose to getting from point A to point B.
Then you ramble on to say, “life is doomed because you were taught, trained to behave in certain ways and punished if you don't”. While I do agree that people are taught behaviors, how does this compare to wild schooling fish? ‘Mama fish’ didn’t teach any behaviors to the offspring, they are innate defensive behaviors.
I only have two questions, how much did you pay for that dope and can I get some?

I know the average IQ in the world is decreasing, but alas, at least there is one no retarded person on this forum who understood my post.

Yes, all living things have trails in common, and that is preciously my point. In fact we share more things in common with cockroaches, fishes and chickens than most people are willing to admit.

No matter what reason behind the things we do, whether is fish swim in schools to avoid predation or people travel in groups for the same reason or to the city to earn a living, the motivation is to stay alive, and that means to copy what others are already doing.

Either it's the instinct or we are taught/trained to do certain things, my point is that people's lives are pretty meaningless, and more or less used and abused to carry out certain goals of nature.

[Jerome Scuggs]

I know the average IQ in the world is decreasing, but alas, at least there is one no retarded person on this forum who understood my post.

Yes, all living things have trails in common, and that is preciously my point. In fact we share more things in common with cockroaches, fishes and chickens than most people are willing to admit.

No matter what reason behind the things we do, whether is fish swim in schools to avoid predation or people travel in groups for the same reason or to the city to earn a living, the motivation is to stay alive, and that means to copy what others are already doing.

Either it's the instinct or we are taught/trained to do certain things, my point is that people's lives are pretty meaningless, and more or less used and abused to carry out certain goals of nature.

wait, are you suggesting that all organisms have common ancestors, and that over time, different species developed slightly different traits that allowed them to survive in different regions, leading to a diverse biosphere with many different and unique organisms?

because you're still an idiot

[Ilya]

I know the average IQ in the world is decreasing, but alas, at least there is one no retarded person on this forum who understood my post.

Yes, all living things have trails in common, and that is preciously my point. In fact we share more things in common with cockroaches, fishes and chickens than most people are willing to admit.

No matter what reason behind the things we do, whether is fish swim in schools to avoid predation or people travel in groups for the same reason or to the city to earn a living, the motivation is to stay alive, and that means to copy what others are already doing.

Either it's the instinct or we are taught/trained to do certain things, my point is that people's lives are pretty meaningless, and more or less used and abused to carry out certain goals of nature.

[paradise!]

but are human fat? Does you?

rofl

[Cops]

she has gotta have her mittens tied to her coat, just sayin.

[Noah]

at least there is one no retarded person on this forum who understood my post.

Hihi, had to be quoted. ^-^

I may be retarded but atleast I don't have fat tits.

[T3l Ca7]

wait, are you suggesting that all organisms have common ancestors, and that over time, different species developed slightly different traits that allowed them to survive in different regions, leading to a diverse biosphere with many different and unique organisms?

because you're still an idiot

That was exactly my point.

I just hope you know that by reinforcing my point, you are helping me to win my argument.

Thanks again for your assistant :wub:

Now, who is the idiot?!

[soup]

Telcat, in your ''must view thread'' you say life sucks.


Why does life suck?

[T3l Ca7]

Telcat, in your ''must view thread'' you say life sucks.


Why does life suck?

You would know why if you have read my posts in this thread :fear:

BTW, I did the JP Morgan challenge (sydney) http://www.jpmorganchasecc.com/ today and came first amongst females in our 50+ strong corporate team :wub:

[Jerome Scuggs]

That was exactly my point.

I just hope you know that by reinforcing my point, you are helping me to win my argument.

Thanks again for your assistant :wub:

Now, who is the idiot?!

while the rest of society has taken this for granted for over 150 years, apparently you have never read the works of one charles darwin.

meaning you are still the idiot.

[Ephemeral]

I know the average IQ in the world is decreasing, but alas, at least there is one no retarded person on this forum who understood my post.

yadda yadda yadda....

Either it's the instinct or we are taught/trained to do certain things, my point is that people's lives are pretty meaningless, and more or less used and abused to carry out certain goals of nature.

I would suggest that seem to be stuck with a negative state of mind or a specific perspective. You have to step outside that type of subjectivism to understand what follows.
Humans are the only animals that can store knowledge for communication to future generations. So if a person contributes to the knowledge base, isn’t that meaningful? How can you, in one sweeping generalization, discount the entire compiled knowledge of mankind as ‘meaningless’? Of course a case can be made that mankind often ignores knowledge and repeats the same mistakes, but that doesn’t make it meaningless. In fact, ANY knowledge that a person contributes to mankind can be considered meaningful, even if that piece of knowledge happens to be wrong. An example would be if a person spend 10 years of his life working towards proving that trees can talk, ultimately the research fails to prove this but the failure itself is knowledge. The researcher can walk around thinking that the last 10 years of his life was meaningless and life is just a ‘rat race’. Or he can take a more positive perspective and consider his research as having value, even if that value is that someone else doesn’t have to repeat his research.
How can this be perceived as being "used and abused to carry out certain goals of nature"?

[404 Not Found]

prescription for TelCat: You seriously just need to get laid and have some damn good all out sex. Take advantage of those chances while you're young!

[paradise!]

the real question here

does you?

[T3l Ca7]

I would suggest that seem to be stuck with a negative state of mind or a specific perspective. You have to step outside that type of subjectivism to understand what follows.
Humans are the only animals that can store knowledge for communication to future generations. So if a person contributes to the knowledge base, isn’t that meaningful? How can you, in one sweeping generalization, discount the entire compiled knowledge of mankind as ‘meaningless’? Of course a case can be made that mankind often ignores knowledge and repeats the same mistakes, but that doesn’t make it meaningless. In fact, ANY knowledge that a person contributes to mankind can be considered meaningful, even if that piece of knowledge happens to be wrong. An example would be if a person spend 10 years of his life working towards proving that trees can talk, ultimately the research fails to prove this but the failure itself is knowledge. The researcher can walk around thinking that the last 10 years of his life was meaningless and life is just a ‘rat race’. Or he can take a more positive perspective and consider his research as having value, even if that value is that someone else doesn’t have to repeat his research.
How can this be perceived as being "used and abused to carry out certain goals of nature"?

Sure, human can store knowledge for communication to future generations. But some animals can do the same. Hunting skills, for example, were passed on from generation to generation in a lot of species of mammals or even birds of preys.

If it is written knowledge you are specifically referring to, then let me ask you this: but for what ultimate purpose, would that be of any importance? Knowledge on it's own, serves no purpose. Wouldn't the gathering of knowledge, eventually, just be another way to help the survival of our specie?

[T3l Ca7]

prescription for TelCat: You seriously just need to get laid and have some damn good all out sex. Take advantage of those chances while you're young!

You sound under sexed, have you ever thought about hooking up with G0ddess? That way, you can get some action going every night