When speaking of odds and metrics there is little value in looking at exceptions, you look at the 'big picture'. And the 'big picture' is was that there were 100 million buyers for 1.5 billion tickets. Very few people did what you say (spend $2), obviously those people we saw standing in those lines were not there to buy a single ticket. There were many reports of people spending thousands of dollars on tickets. The demographics of tickets buyers is also meaningful, the lower you are on the income scale the more likely you are to spend money on a chance to win something you have virtually no chance to win.
The money spent on this lottery could have filled the gas tanks of 685,000 households for an entire year. Same amount of money would have paid to put 2.4 million iPads in the hands of school children. Only approximately 50% of the total sales actually goes to the jackpot and about 20% goes to the cost of running the lottery. None of this can be considered 'productivity', none of it helps the GNP and our standing in the world economy. It is a state-sponsored industry with no positive end game. IMO, Americans should be smarter than this.
eph
The money spent on this lottery could have filled the gas tanks of 685,000 households for an entire year. Same amount of money would have paid to put 2.4 million iPads in the hands of school children. Only approximately 50% of the total sales actually goes to the jackpot and about 20% goes to the cost of running the lottery. None of this can be considered 'productivity', none of it helps the GNP and our standing in the world economy. It is a state-sponsored industry with no positive end game. IMO, Americans should be smarter than this.
eph
Comment