Originally posted by pascone
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
First 2D Spaceship Law Agency :: We bring you justice!
Collapse
X
-
clearly no one filled you in that bike didnt get banned for cheating.Originally posted by Izor View PostZazu died to about 75% of shots that actually hit him. Aquatiq likes to take my cheater calls and alt-tab, or in the case of jack last week sometime, watch as he spikes and kills people and claim his lag is 'within limits'. Regardless, at least someone got banned..although it was the wrong one
Comment
-
WELLJDQMSKJFFQMJEIFJQMBEIVQMDJAM82342912"&é('(é'&ç à é"'èOriginally posted by RiiStar View PostNot anymore
With my suggestion DCME added in "text-tile" define ur alpha-numeric tiles, bind them to ur keys and click then type...
:fear:
doesn't it create like a huge text font?
9:The Unliked One...> still if you change the rules at the .lvl every needs to dl the whole .lvl again
9:The Unliked One...> if .lvz you just need to do the rules
^help: (how do i shot) (Public 0): how do i travel diagonally? i only have up, down, left and right keys.
4:PinkSTAR <ER>> ask DP he knows me inside and out
Comment
-
-
OH MB NOW I SEE IT! it was in sertifis pms but I posted it, ok. i thought you ment that I said that ;POriginally posted by Zerzera View PostIt says posted, you posted that.
help: (how do i shot) (Public 0): how do i travel diagonally? i only have up, down, left and right keys.
4:PinkSTAR <ER>> ask DP he knows me inside and out
Comment
-
In all seriousness; a public body who's job it is to scrutinise staff complaints - not staff - and who had access to logs and could see what had happened would be cool. Not that anyone would be allowed access or anyone would be unbiased enough, but it would be coolOriginally posted by Facetiousedit: (Money just PMed me his address so I can go to Houston and fight him)
Comment
-
Wanted this on the second page, not tucked away at the bottom of the firstOriginally posted by ZeUs!! View PostIn all seriousness; a public body who's job it is to scrutinise staff complaints - not staff - and who had access to logs and could see what had happened would be cool. Not that anyone would be allowed access or anyone would be unbiased enough, but it would be coolOriginally posted by Facetiousedit: (Money just PMed me his address so I can go to Houston and fight him)
Comment
-
I think this could work if members of TW was allowed to "vote" on a "council" of representatives (the public body) who would scrutinize staff decisions. Essentially, it would be a way to ensure the decisions made inside TW are representative of what the "people" want or agree to.Originally posted by ZeUs!! View PostIn all seriousness; a public body who's job it is to scrutinise staff complaints - not staff - and who had access to logs and could see what had happened would be cool. Not that anyone would be allowed access or anyone would be unbiased enough, but it would be cool
Of course I doubt staff would be willing to implement something like this, but I agree that a public body responsible for scrutiny would be a cool idea.
Comment
-
It's an interesting idea but probably wouldn't work. It's important enough to have a Smod position for even though upper staffers are very open about decisions and changes, at least with each other. As for complaints I try to make sure the person(s) complaining are informed about any decisions or changes as a result of the complaint. Having advocates for bans and warnings is just plain stupid.Originally posted by ZeUs!! View PostIn all seriousness; a public body who's job it is to scrutinise staff complaints - not staff - and who had access to logs and could see what had happened would be cool. Not that anyone would be allowed access or anyone would be unbiased enough, but it would be cool
Comment
Channels
Collapse

Comment