Lower WBDuel/JavDuel... player requirement to 2v2?

[Shadowmere]

Hey guys.

A player or two have expressed their wish for this to happen.
What are your thoughts? Yes/no, and why?

I'll respond to your comments from my point of view.

[Turban]

the map(s) are far too large to support a healthy 2 vs 2 format. 3 vs 3 is already bad enough.

it would be more beneficial to simply advertise the duel2 arena and perhaps update the maps.

[Fork]

Could 2 vs 3 happen if the 2 players can't find a 3rd and feel they are confident enough?

[Shadowmere]

the map(s) are far too large to support a healthy 2 vs 2 format. 3 vs 3 is already bad enough.

it would be more beneficial to simply advertise the duel2 arena and perhaps update the maps.

I agree.

Could 2 vs 3 happen if the 2 players can't find a 3rd and feel they are confident enough?

We're not looking to break the baseline of "even / fair game" just to satisfy egos. That much is already possible by being a captain refusing to add even teams, and a 2 v 3 would be just as possible as a 3 v 4 if the # of players required would be less.

[Dreamwin]

the map(s) are far too large to support a healthy 2 vs 2 format. 3 vs 3 is already bad enough.

agree 100%

TWDD/TWJD maps should probably be smaller anyway. It used to be so that TWJD map was separate from TWLJ map. (TWLJ map had more room)

[olde]

We have ?go duel2 for that :/

[Fork]

I agree.



We're not looking to break the baseline of "even / fair game" just to satisfy egos. That much is already possible by being a captain refusing to add even teams, and a 2 v 3 would be just as possible as a 3 v 4 if the # of players required would be less.

Tbh 90% of this community have a big ego. Meh I only suggested it only because I've seen this happen when only 5 turn up and can't start the game... Then people leave after 30 seconds, but had a game started 2 vs 3 then a random player would prob turn up and be added. Mayb I was wrong

[qan]

Tbh 90% of this community have a big ego. Meh I only suggested it only because I've seen this happen when only 5 turn up and can't start the game... Then people leave after 30 seconds, but had a game started 2 vs 3 then a random player would prob turn up and be added. Mayb I was wrong

This is one of the arguments I'd heard for allowing to start with 2s as well. Not so much as people desired to play 2v2 wbduel, but that it was the only way to get a game started in some situations, with the hope of adding some late entrants.

As was aleady pointed out, this would also allow 2v3 for the purpose of bragging, or again, in search of possible 3s.

Arena size is a bit large ofc. Could always expand like elim does. But if the prospect of late entrants isn't all that important we could also simply advertise duel2 in the greet msg or periodic of wbduel.

[Crescent Seal]

no and remove 3vs3 too

[2pac]

This is one of the arguments I'd heard for allowing to start with 2s as well. Not so much as people desired to play 2v2 wbduel, but that it was the only way to get a game started in some situations, with the hope of adding some late entrants.

As was aleady pointed out, this would also allow 2v3 for the purpose of bragging, or again, in search of possible 3s.

Arena size is a bit large ofc. Could always expand like elim does. But if the prospect of late entrants isn't all that important we could also simply advertise duel2 in the greet msg or periodic of wbduel.

allow 6v6

[Jones]

agree 100%

TWDD/TWJD maps should probably be smaller anyway. It used to be so that TWJD map was separate from TWLJ map. (TWLJ map had more room)

I disagree. TWD should prepare your squad for TWL. What the fuck is 3v3 doing in TWD anyway?

Add a 2v2 ladder to elim instead of ruining perfectly good praccing arenas that doesn't involve having to wait for a 4th squaddie.

2v2 or 3v3 javs/wbs makes as much sense as 5v5 basing in terms of leagues.

[Fork]

I disagree. TWD should prepare your squad for TWL. What the fuck is 3v3 doing in TWD anyway?

Add a 2v2 ladder to elim instead of ruining perfectly good praccing arenas that doesn't involve having to wait for a 4th squaddie.

2v2 or 3v3 javs/wbs makes as much sense as 5v5 basing in terms of leagues.

Seems like you're stuck in the past. You really think we have the population for a min of 4 vs 4's in twd games? Have it your way and there would be only 1-3 games played per day compared to like 8 if left as it is. Tbh if the popualtion continues to decline, there will be 4 vs 4 in twl games instead of 5 unless they want twl to die.

[mtine]

Seems like you're an idiot...now and in the past. Gtfo from this thread while u still have some dignity left. Else Big Cris is gonna vs u and then...whoa, u don't even wanna know.

[Fork]

Seems like you're an idiot...now and in the past. Gtfo from this thread while u still have some dignity left. Else Big Cris is gonna vs u and then...whoa, u don't even wanna know.

Mtine look at your reputation bar... If I'm an idiot then I don't think a word exists yet to describe u. Enough said.

[mtine]

Who cares about reputation bar. Jeez, get with the flow dude. If you're a fgt, doesn't mean everyone is too. Stop being an asshole and actually do something productive. Done with ur crying posts on forums.