Elim - Changes & New Season Coming!

[Mastersword]

A higher streak bonus would be good imo. Reward the winner.

But also a streak breaker bonus for the person who beats them. To try and keep games going when someone's dominating.

That is part of the new formula

[Sulla]

-1 . .

[qan]

side note: why are stats already reset... way to waste peoples time who played yesterday

Season starts June 15. We're testing new features at present. Expect changes and another reset when the season starts, possibly several more in between now and then. It's an unfortunate byproduct of a game that is not monetized in any way and has a tiny development staff working in spare time that we have to test live. Alternative is basically to not have development.

[zidane]

side note: why are stats already reset... way to waste peoples time who played yesterday

[Rab]

A higher streak bonus would be good imo. Reward the winner.

But also a streak breaker bonus for the person who beats them. To try and keep games going when someone's dominating.

[zidane]

i won 4 in a row yesterday with a decent amount playing and got i think 51k for the last win, it's a start but could probably be improved since I don't think that's a lot for any actual ppl who pub. not that i use pub bucks anyway

[Dierienow]

I've seen people win it multiple times in a row way more than I can count. Also it shows huge wins in the chat 5 times in a row how am I supposed to know they're losing money? I just spend 10 mins in pub, see that pee pee sock or Envithyx won $600,000 by sending a line to the bot, and guarantees I will never spend any effort on $16k elim wins again. Seeing that dollar amount at the end is such an insult.. there are actual good players wanting to play elim please don't scare them away with terrible rewards for their time, effort, and the reduced population in pub. 500 decoys isn't enough reward for the effort a Winner such as myself puts in, sorry. Maybe I'll start a GoFundMe or else my time is better spent earning Roblox dollars..

[Wirah]

Hate the game not the player as they say well anyways pee pee sock can make $200k from sending a command to the bot but if you win elim you make like 20k maximum.. So please ban pee pee sock for hacking the game thank you have a great nite.

That is the !fruit feature of the Pub bot. It's just gambling and I'm pretty sure by the time you win $200K you've already blown $800K flooding the same command for 20 minutes.

[Dierienow]

Hate the game not the player as they say well anyways pee pee sock can make $200k from sending a command to the bot but if you win elim you make like 20k maximum.. So please ban pee pee sock for hacking the game thank you have a great nite.

[qan]

It also won't punish you for it, as in it should rate you based on the number of deaths you were allotted, rather than the total number. So if you enter in with 3 lives, it rates you as if the game's to 3. Which means there's no reason why not to !late, if you're looking to play.

Most implementations of late entrants in elimination set remaining lives equal to most deaths. It's not as fun for the late entrant, but it totally sidesteps any discussion about whether or not it's fair. If you did average deaths, you'd see people waiting out elims until the end (which would also reduce overall activity), especially small ones. The most extreme case I can think of is an elim to 10 with 2 players ... one's on 9, one's on 7. !late gets in with 8, and just needs to go 3-2 to win. Considering ratings in the next season will also give a reasonable bonus for wins, this could be an issue.

Also, !late up to 1st elimination is live now.

[Rab]

I guess. I think that's harsh on the late person, but it doesn't really matter, I've never felt like I've had too few deaths, but maybe that's just because not much happens in 60 seconds. \o/

[Mastersword]

Yeah it would be good to know what currently happens, ty.

Currently, it sets the person entering in late to the highest death value. In other words, whoever has the highest amount of deaths at the time the person is entering late, that is the number of deaths the person will enter with. Make sense?

[Rab]

Yeah it would be good to know what currently happens, ty.

[Mastersword]

Yeah less deaths, not avg deaths at time of entry as someone proposed.

I was under the impression that the person enters with the same amount of deaths as the person with the fewest remaining? I'll test out the late deaths today and see how its being done.

[skyforger]

Yeah less deaths, not avg deaths at time of entry as someone proposed.