TWD Roster Limit? (Just asking, don't trip)

[Merkaba]

Geez, I'm not attacking sk8, just using sk8 as an example of a somewhat large squad. Yeah, Militaris is the same right now we have about 41 members.

Well Anzu made an interesting point; Why don't we just change TWL. I assume TWL would never change, that is why I said this.

So far, the poll indicates overwelmly that people don't care much for roster limits.

Also Value is a good example of a small squad just doing fine. A successful squad could just be run by 8-13 members who are active/good/loyal.

I just agreed with Dameon that smaller squads would let the talent spread and possibly create more competitive squads.

[Peace_Maker]

Dameon, some people do not have time or want to take the time to check the forums every day. I voted. Happy? :P Limiting the ammount of members allowed on a squad would either create a lot more competitive squads or make the difference between the league squads a bigger gap. By the way, I do not see why a member should be on a squad if they are not going to be able to play in TWL. Why not set a limit on TWD and then the TWL limit will be covered under the same rule. I voted 35.

[Kuukunen]

Also Value is a good example of a small squad just doing fine. A successful squad could just be run by 8-13 members who are active/good/loyal.

Well a successful wb/jav jav squad could be run with 5 members. :P

Problem is that with older squads, the old people tend to get a bit inactive. Unlike with newer squads with people all excited about stuff.

[Sufficient]

I think for TWL the roster should be as small as possible bc it is a competitive environment ... imho I don't want too many inactives on ANY TWL squad. However, I think it makes some sense to make TWD more accessible to the older and/or inactive ppl.

[Dameon Angell]

[FINAL SCORE = 37 - 31 :: No Limit wins] %5

Thread is now done.