Just a thought, but would there be a way to implement a system wherein players in game can message the matchbot with a command such as "!beep," and on the TWD website once a squad has a minimum of 3 beeps, "Cobra is seeking a TWDD" can be posted in the top left corner of the TWD site very visibly? That way, without logging in, players could still know whats going on in game instead of assuming nothing is going on and staying offline (which I assume many people do). Also, once a team has 3 !beeps, perhaps the bot can PM any available (A)/(C) to ask them what game they're looking for. For example:
(MatchBot)>Your team has 3 active beeps (Pressure, Ricko, turban). Type !sitechallenge twbd, twjd, twdd to designate advertised website challenge.
Then, that advertisement will show up on the TWD site as:
Squads online:
Cobra (3): challenging TWDD
In another scenario, any challenge in game can be posted on the website similarly, without having to !beep the bot. However, squads will only challenge when they have beeps, and players will only beep if they think theres a possibility of a game. Look at the population right now, no one beeps because no one thinks there's hope for a game. This is why I think the first suggestion (with !beeps) would be more ideal than the second suggestion, but I think either would still be an improvement to encourage those who are offline to log in.
(MatchBot)>Your team has 3 active beeps (Pressure, Ricko, turban). Type !sitechallenge twbd, twjd, twdd to designate advertised website challenge.
Then, that advertisement will show up on the TWD site as:
Squads online:
Cobra (3): challenging TWDD
In another scenario, any challenge in game can be posted on the website similarly, without having to !beep the bot. However, squads will only challenge when they have beeps, and players will only beep if they think theres a possibility of a game. Look at the population right now, no one beeps because no one thinks there's hope for a game. This is why I think the first suggestion (with !beeps) would be more ideal than the second suggestion, but I think either would still be an improvement to encourage those who are offline to log in.
Comment