Look back on Week 2

[Da1andonly]

I don't see it as a major impact on the game if 2 out of 8 can't play cause of lag. Show more.

[Sleepy Weasel]

We had 4 guys that couldn't play cause of lag in a game we lost by 2 deaths. I think it had an "impact"

[PjOtTeR]

We had 8 which should be enough.... but cause of router problems 2 were laggy.... if that hasn't an 'impact' you are nuts.... and again, sure we could have showed more... but we do not have to show more then 8, and since we had none to sub the 2 laggers(laggers cus of router problem) i think the router failure had a big impact on the game... and once again :

4.01: If an unpredictable server crash, router failure, TWBot failure, or other event has a massive impact on a game in progress, the match will be cancelled and all current scores discarded. The game will then be replayed at a later time. (See Rules 4.02, 4.03 and 4.04)

If you think 2 players lagging cause of router and thus a team not having enough to play.... isn't a massive impact, you are just plain retarded. Why have such a rule? If when it happens it isn't enforced saying: You have a lot more on roster they could have showed up aswell. Saying that is just plain retarded.... but hey, what ya expect from da1......

[Da1andonly]

I'm not in charge of appeals or whatever, actually I don't have ANYTHING to do with it. I'm just stating what I think is obvious. Show MORE then 8 to a game.

In sleepys case that's already something that made an impact imo, if 4 guys are lagging and simply can't play, but if it's only two then it's your own fault.


Pjoter, ask yourself this question...would you only want to show 5 for a TWLJ game vs. a good squad? I mean yeah, you only NEED to show 5...but if you don't show more, just-in-case, it's your own fucking problem.

[Hercules]

Mambo, do you accept a replay of week 2 TWLB vs Pirates?

I think the ops should talk more, or just reschedule the games that were massively impacted because of the router crash. Playing 6v8 because 2 players lagged is a "massive impact", no squad can win 6v8 unless your playing against Wolvencreed. I think if Pure Luck would have the same situation where Spastic showed the exact amount to a game, thats 8 (Thats all you need to play a basing game) and 2 lagged out, he probably would have appealed. But due to the fact that this is the basing league, he wants to have all the chance of success for himself and is not willing to look in details about the rules of the league games. Really, he knew there was a problem, Rodge watched the game and knew there was a problem. I really dont see why they aren't doing anything at all about this, and this bugs me because next week, I want to play 10v8 only because 8v8 is a rule, HEY now, it doesn't have to be enforced, there is nobody there to enforce it, lets just set ship ourselves in and make this a game.

Wtf kind of bullshit is this? Just replay the games at 1:00 and make the squads fukking happy. So anyways, mambo rematch for week 2.

[Jessus]

Whats the point of having rules if nobody is going to follow them, not even the ops themselves. Are they just there to fill up space?

Got my point hercules (Tho I'm not speakin anything about this weekend). I have said this so many times earlier...

[Underground]

Hercules, why do u keep saying it was the router problem if Phrenitis was one of the players affected and that router COULDNT affect him? stop finding excuses and try to bring more players to the games.

[kicker]

I agree with Hercules, replay all the matches at 1:00. Ease, the captain of sk8, said there should be a replay w/ sk8 vs dragon. It was a waste of time and a week of leagues for us. It doesnt matter if the router affect 1-8 players, if it affect the outcome, it should be replayed. A 1 person advantage can affect the outcome of any game, much less 2 3 4 or 5 players.

[Jones]

?squadjoin=Eurocrew:apa

[Hercules]

Hercules, why do u keep saying it was the router problem if Phrenitis was one of the players affected and that router COUDDNT affect him? stop finding excuses and try to bring more players to the games.

UG, a router down means anyone could be affected, Did you not know that ?

[Underground]

Not that problem everyone is talking about Hercules.. It's supposed to be a router that didnt let the West Coast players be able to play. It's not the first time Phrenitis isnt able to stay in, in a TWL sesaon 8 game. Its his own lag problem.

[Underground]

I agree with Hercules, replay all the matches at 1:00. Ease, the captain of sk8, said there should be a replay w/ sk8 vs dragon. It was a waste of time and a week of leagues for us. It doesnt matter if the router affect 1-8 players, if it affect the outcome, it should be replayed. A 1 person advantage can affect the outcome of any game, much less 2 3 4 or 5 players.

Stop quoting things that Ease DIDNT say. I asked him already and he only said that if the TWL ops would ask to rematch we'd accept it. I dont think it should be replayed neither does Ease.

[PredatoR_FNM]

Mambo, do you accept a replay of week 2 TWLB vs Pirates?

It is not on our hands really, its decided by twl ops.

Reality was that you guys had total of 1 player in who might have been in spec due this infamous router crash, we on other hand had ~15 players showed up and we had nobody laggin out due that router.

Also Finnish players like myself did not experience lag enyhow, so phren being laggy had nothing to do with this router, as undeground implied already.

It was sad match indeed but you guys should look into mirror on this one really.

[Mulkero]

TWLJ Pallies vs. Thrill, ?go twljThrill

Our map still isn't right. Easton doesn't seem to know what he's doing :-P

[Rigor]

u guys need to cool off its just a game <_<