There are two primary considerations to consider when thinking about 'MVP's', the criteria used and the selection method.
'MVP' is can be considered in many ways but these are the various criteria that I can think of that are often used;
- skill of player (actual value of a player to his squad)
- number of games played
- the player who demonstrates leadership
- general character, disposition, loyalty and effort of the player
- player who demonstrates the ability to bring his squad to a winning/playoff position
- player who brings his heart to the game
The other primary consideration is 'who selects or votes'? Let's consider the question another way, who are the best people to know what value a player has contributed to his squad? Would this not be the Captain and Assistant Captains to the squad? How can anyone else possibly know something as important as value to his squad? How can speccers judge whether or not a player is doing what his Captain has asked them to do? No one can see this in any statistic, no one can know this without being on the squad.
No matter how 'great' (skillful) a player is, he does not help his squad if he only shows up for 60% of the games played. But on the other hand, a Captain knows whether or not the player has legitimate reasons not to show up. Other people generally do not know these things. It would suck to not consider someone who has not been able to make games due to his cancer treatment, death in his family, service to his country or society, etc.
I propose that MVP be given at the squad level and the choice is made by the leadership of the squad.
thoughts?
'MVP' is can be considered in many ways but these are the various criteria that I can think of that are often used;
- skill of player (actual value of a player to his squad)
- number of games played
- the player who demonstrates leadership
- general character, disposition, loyalty and effort of the player
- player who demonstrates the ability to bring his squad to a winning/playoff position
- player who brings his heart to the game
The other primary consideration is 'who selects or votes'? Let's consider the question another way, who are the best people to know what value a player has contributed to his squad? Would this not be the Captain and Assistant Captains to the squad? How can anyone else possibly know something as important as value to his squad? How can speccers judge whether or not a player is doing what his Captain has asked them to do? No one can see this in any statistic, no one can know this without being on the squad.
No matter how 'great' (skillful) a player is, he does not help his squad if he only shows up for 60% of the games played. But on the other hand, a Captain knows whether or not the player has legitimate reasons not to show up. Other people generally do not know these things. It would suck to not consider someone who has not been able to make games due to his cancer treatment, death in his family, service to his country or society, etc.
I propose that MVP be given at the squad level and the choice is made by the leadership of the squad.
thoughts?
Comment