6 squads in playoffs?

[Ignominy]

quarters: A: 3v6, B: 4v5
semis: C: 1vB, D: 2vA
finals: CvD

that's the way it's supposed to go

that's unquestionably the best way to do it

Still don't see the point of not having 8 team playoffs and making 1&2 play the first week, it's just two less games for everyone, and they'll still have an advantage in seeding because 1 will be playing 8 and 2 will be playing 7.

[Sufficient]

quarters: A: 3v6, B: 4v5
semis: C: 1vB, D: 2vA
finals: CvD

that's the way it's supposed to go

Exactly. Short and simple. 12 teams. 6 make playoffs. Top 2 get byes. 5 games total in playoffs including championship game.

[Plasma]

And Team #5 gets ignored altogether :P

its late. forgot 5 came after 4. screw team 5. i think its edited right now

[Miku19]

quarters: A: 3v6, B: 4v5
semis: C: 1vB, D: 2vA
finals: CvD

that's the way it's supposed to go

[Audit]

let me clarify. seed #2 vs #4 for quarter finals seed #3 and seed #6 for semis
SEMIFINAL ROUND: winner of #2 vs #4 plays #1 and winner of #3 and #6 plays #2.
FINAL ROUND (holla): Winners of semi 1 vs winners of semi 2

then. ?go twlj,twlb

Twl Season 10
Champions- Pandora
Caps- Sarger, Vatican Assassin, Mouse
Players- reputation, plasma, eelam,... etc.

And Team #5 gets ignored altogether :P

[Plasma]

I'm not sure what you mean by this, a second round after regular season?

If this is playoffs then 3 would play against 5 (and 2 against 4) and that's just wrong.

let me clarify. seed #3 vs #5 for quarter finals seed #4 and seed #6 for semis
SEMIFINAL ROUND: winner of #3 vs #5 plays #1 and winner of #4 and #6 plays #2.
FINAL ROUND (holla): Winners of semi 1 vs winners of semi 2

then. ?go twlj,twlb

Twl Season 10
Champions- Pandora
Caps- Sarger, Vatican Assassin, Mouse
Players- reputation, plasma, eelam,... etc.

[Audit]

It would be kinda interesting to have 8 teams and possibly do a 2 loss elimination style playoff. Some teams are very good and have a bad day and don't get to show what they're really made of and some fluke teams that really don't deserve to move to the next round end up being there. Double elim style playoffs could somewhat fix that and make everything truly fair. Everyone starts in the "winners bracket", losers of the first games drop to the "losers bracket". At this point you have 4 team in each bracket. Winners bracket teams play each other, likewise in losers bracket. Again, winners bracket game losers drop to losers bracket, losers bracket game losers are out. And repeat until you have one team left in winners bracket and one team left in losers bracket. Then the final...the winners bracket team has to lose twice to be out, whereas the losers bracket finalists only get one chance.

[Miku19]

A nice solution for conferences is to just seed them based on regular season play. Conference 1: #1,#3, #5 Conference 2: #2, #4, #6. Seeding based on wins/losses in regular season. Tiebreaker coming from head to head or points spread. #1 and #2 taking a bye week in their conferences, respectively.

I'm not sure what you mean by this, a second round after regular season?

If this is playoffs then 3 would play against 5 (and 2 against 4) and that's just wrong.

[Ward]

Immaterial - grade 6 word that isn't used a lot. How about addressing the actual issue and not derailing the topic to some useless English lessons

[Plasma]

Seed it

A nice solution for conferences is to just seed them based on regular season play. Conference 1: #1,#3, #5 Conference 2: #2, #4, #6. Seeding based on wins/losses in regular season. Tiebreaker coming from head to head or points spread. #1 and #2 taking a bye week in their conferences, respectively.

[Jeenyuss]

i want 8 teams in the playoffs.

[genocidal]

Ok, I accept the verbose comment - I was unsure of it's actual word form as I've heard it misused in conversation many times.

K.

The main essence of what I was trying to say was that it was an overly complex word in a bid to make himself look more intellectual when infact the point carried itself.

How is "immaterial" an overly complex word? It seems to me, and everyone else, that you're more guilty of that than he is when you use words that you aren't even sure what part of speech they are.

Immaterial does not make semantical sense, unless you warp the general goal posts of linguistic understanding to a state where anything can be explained by some illogical route of creative insanity.

Well congratulations, you made yourself look even more confused and stupid. Creative insanity? Immaterial means irrelevant. You don't have to be creative to understand what he said - it makes perfect sense. I'm sorry you've never heard the word before.

stupid? I'm not going to give you my academic credentials but I'm pretty sure they're better than yours : )

I doubt you've graduated high school so why are you starting this conversation?

[MetalHeadz]

"Complex verbose" makes no sense. "Verbose" is an adjective and cannot be used as a noun.

Grammatically he was slightly incorrect - semantically it does make sense. He should have said, "The advancement system based on +/- in regular season is immaterial to how a squad will perform in playoffs."

Ok, I accept the verbose comment - I was unsure of it's actual word form as I've heard it misused in conversation many times.

The main essence of what I was trying to say was that it was an overly complex word in a bid to make himself look more intellectual when infact the point carried itself.
Immaterial does not make semantical sense, unless you warp the general goal posts of linguistic understanding to a state where anything can be explained by some illogical route of creative insanity.

Based on your post and your history of idiocy I would say that you're both A.) non-native English speaker and B.) stupid. So please, spare us all your "lessons" in grammar and vocabulary.

Based on my post? Ok, I was illinformed about the exact word-type of 'verbose'

History of idiocy? Hmm, evidence?

non-native English speaker? Refering to my first point, I was slightly confused about a word type, very irrational evaluation of such a minor 'offence'.

stupid? I'm not going to give you my academic credentials but I'm pretty sure they're better than yours : )

[Pummel]

Ez

Supercalifragilisticexpialidocious

Hepaticocholangiocholecystentersotomies

Aopadotenachoselachogaleokranioleipsanodrinhipotri mmatosilphioparaomelitok-atakechymenokichlepikossyphophattoperisteralektrio noptekephalliokigklopeleiolagoi-osiraiovaphetraganopterygon

Antidisestablishmentarianism

Pneumonoultramicroscopicsilicovolcanoconiosis

[genocidal]

Nice point Ward. However, there was a certain word that really made me think 'wow, he's some worthless dumbfuck who's trying so hard to use complex verbose in order to make his point seem more important.'

"Complex verbose" makes no sense. "Verbose" is an adjective and cannot be used as a noun.

Firstly 'immaterial' cannot be used in this sentence both semantically and grammatically. Secondly, something can't be 'very' immaterial. Immaterial is a definite, there cannot be any pre-adjectival determinant. A more appropriate word would have been 'misrepresentative.'

Grammatically he was slightly incorrect - semantically it does make sense. He should have said, "The advancement system based on +/- in regular season is immaterial to how a squad will perform in playoffs."

Based on your post and your history of idiocy I would say that you're both A.) non-native English speaker and B.) stupid. So please, spare us all your "lessons" in grammar and vocabulary.